مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
شنبه 3 خرداد 1404
[Archive]
دوره 13، شماره 3 - ( 1403 )
جلد 13 شماره 3 صفحات 86-79 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Afsharfard A, Ebrahimibagha H, Mohammadi A, Zeinalpour A. Medial Breast Reconstruction after Breast Conserving Surgery with Local Flap: A Single Center Experience. WJPS 2024; 13 (3) :79-86
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1358-fa.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1358-fa.html
Medial Breast Reconstruction after Breast Conserving Surgery with Local Flap: A Single Center Experience. مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک. 1403; 13 (3) :79-86
چکیده: (657 مشاهده)
Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and post-surgical radiotherapy are the treatment of choice in early-stage breast cancers. Surgeons use different techniques for the reconstruction of the breast after BCS. We aimed to present our novel reconstruction technique for medial breast defects and report the follow-up results of patients who underwent breast reconstruction using this method in the short and long term.
Methods: Forty patients with medially located breast tumors under BCS referred to Shahid Modares Hospital in Tehran, Iran from 2018 to 2022 were enrolled in the study. The patients underwent breast reconstruction post-lumpectomy using the local transposition flap technique. We followed the patients for one year, and the satisfaction and complication results were assessed and reported post-operation, after radio-chemotherapy, and after one year.
Results: The patients’ mean age was 48.4 (±12.3) years, and the mean BMI was 30.9 (±3.1). There were no cases of complication, including infection, seroma formation, hematoma, flap ischemia, or necrosis post-operation, one week and one month after discharge. The surgeon and patient satisfaction surveys conducted post-op, after the radio-chemotherapy course, and one year after BCS using the Breast-Q satisfaction domain showed that the excellent and good satisfaction rates are 88%, 92%, and 92%, respectively.
Conclusion: Local transposition flap has remarkable cosmetic results with the least complication rate in the reconstruction of medial breast defects after breast-conserving surgery and is an excellent choice for surgeons.
Methods: Forty patients with medially located breast tumors under BCS referred to Shahid Modares Hospital in Tehran, Iran from 2018 to 2022 were enrolled in the study. The patients underwent breast reconstruction post-lumpectomy using the local transposition flap technique. We followed the patients for one year, and the satisfaction and complication results were assessed and reported post-operation, after radio-chemotherapy, and after one year.
Results: The patients’ mean age was 48.4 (±12.3) years, and the mean BMI was 30.9 (±3.1). There were no cases of complication, including infection, seroma formation, hematoma, flap ischemia, or necrosis post-operation, one week and one month after discharge. The surgeon and patient satisfaction surveys conducted post-op, after the radio-chemotherapy course, and one year after BCS using the Breast-Q satisfaction domain showed that the excellent and good satisfaction rates are 88%, 92%, and 92%, respectively.
Conclusion: Local transposition flap has remarkable cosmetic results with the least complication rate in the reconstruction of medial breast defects after breast-conserving surgery and is an excellent choice for surgeons.
فهرست منابع
1. 1 Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347(16):1227-32. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa020989]
2. 2 Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med 1981;305(1):6-11. [DOI:10.1056/NEJM198107023050102]
3. 3 Veronesi U, Banfi A, Saccozzi R, et al. Conservative treatment of breast cancer: a trial in progress at the Cancer Institute of Milan. Cancer 1977;39(6):2822-6.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197706)39:6<2822::AID-CNCR2820390670>3.0.CO;2-# [DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(197706)39:63.0.CO;2-#]
4. 4 Christiansen P, Mele M, Bodilsen A, Rocco N, Zachariae R. Breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy?: impact on survival. Ann Surg 2022;3(4):e205. [DOI:10.1097/AS9.0000000000000205]
5. 5 Schover LR, Yetman RJ, Tuason LJ, et al. Partial mastectomy and breast reconstruction. A comparison of their effects on psychosocial adjustment, body image, and sexuality. Cancer 1995;75(1):54-64.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950101)75:1<54::AID-CNCR2820750111>3.0.CO;2-I [DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19950101)75:13.0.CO;2-I]
6. 6 Kurtz J. Impact of radiotherapy on breast cosmesis. The Breast 1995;4(3):163-9. [DOI:10.1016/0960-9776(95)90069-1]
7. 7 Kroll SS, Singletary SE. Repair of partial mastectomy defects. Clin Plast Surg 1998;25(2):303-10. [DOI:10.1016/S0094-1298(20)32509-8]
8. 8 Dean C, Chetty U, Forrest A. Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy. The Lancet 1983;321(8322):459-62. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(83)91452-6]
9. 9 Clough KB, Kroll SS, Audretsch W. An approach to the repair of partial mastectomy defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104(2):409-20. [DOI:10.1097/00006534-199908000-00014]
10. 10 Brierley J, Paterson I, Lallemand R, Rostom A. The influence of breast size on late radiation reaction following excision and radiotherapy for early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1991;3(1):6-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0936-6555(05)81031-3]
11. 11 Yang JD, Kim MC, Lee JW, et al. Usefulness of Oncoplastic Volume Replacement Techniques after Breast Conserving Surgery in Small to Moderate-sized Breasts. Arch Plast Surg 2012 Sep;39(5):489-96. [DOI:10.5999/aps.2012.39.5.489]
12. 12 Bright CJ, Rea DW, Francis A, Feltbower RG. Comparison of quadrant-specific breast cancer incidence trends in the United States and England between 1975 and 2013. Cancer Epidemiol 2016 Oct;44:186-94. [DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2016.08.019]
13. 13 André C, Holsti C, Svenner A, et al. Recurrence and survival after standard versus oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. BJS Open 2021;5(1):zraa013. [DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zraa013]
14. 14 Lin J, Chen D-R, Wang Y-F, Lai H-W. Oncoplastic surgery for upper/upper inner quadrant breast cancer. PLoS One 2016;11(12):e0168434. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168434]
15. 15 Grisotti A, Calabrese C. Conservation treatment of breast cancer: reconstructive problems. Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art 2nd ed Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2006:147-78.
16. 16 Krämer S, Kuemmel S, Camara O, Grosse R, Friedrich M, Blohmer J-U. Partial mastectomy reconstruction with local and distant tissue flaps. Breast Care 2007;2(5):299-306. [DOI:10.1159/000109244]
17. 17 Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2010 May;17(5):1375-91. [DOI:10.1245/s10434-009-0792-y]
18. 18 Audretsch WP, Rezai M, Kolotas C, Zamboglou N, Schnabel T, Bojar H. Tumor-specific immediate reconstruction in breast cancer patients. Perspectives in Plastic Surgery 1998;11(01):71-100. [DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1080243]
19. 19 Rezai M, Nestle-Kramling C. Onkoplastische Operationstechniken bei der brusterhaltenden Therapie des Mammakarzinoms. Der Gynäkologe 1999;32(2):83-90. [DOI:10.1007/s001290050397]
20. 20 Krämer S, Jäger W, Lang N, Beckmann M. Operative Therapie des Mammakarzinoms. J Menopause 2004;11:9-15.
21. 21 Dieterich H, Heyl V, Scheler P, Blazek J, Hoffmann G, Nestle-Krämling C. Rekonstruktion der Brust mit Eigengewebe. Der Gynäkologe 2005;38(3):236-42. [DOI:10.1007/s00129-005-1665-5]
22. 22 Anderson BO, Masetti R, Silverstein MJ. Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniques. Lancet Oncol 2005;6(3):145-57. [DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(05)01765-1]
23. 23 Afsharfard A, Ebrahimibagha H, Zeinalpour A. A Novel Local Transposition Flap for Lateral Breast Reconstruction After Breast Conserving Surgery. Clin Breast Cancer 2021 Jan 23. [DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2021.01.016]
24. 24 Nebril BA, Ramírez SB, Novoa AG, Lamas CV. Rotational flaps in oncologic breast surgery. Anatomical and technical considerations. Cirugía Española (English Edition) 2016;94(7):372-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.cireng.2016.08.006]
25. 25 Audretsch W. Reconstrucción para defectos de mastectomia parcial: clasificación y método. Cirugía de la mama Principios y arte Filadelfia: AMOLCA 2008:179-216.
26. 26 Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009 Aug;124(2):345-53. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807]
27. 27 Bulstrode NW, Shrotria S. Prediction of cosmetic outcome following conservative breast surgery using breast volume measurements. Breast 2001 Apr;10(2):124-6. [DOI:10.1054/brst.2000.0197]
28. 28 Bertozzi N, Pesce M, Santi PL, Raposio E. Oncoplastic breast surgery: comprehensive review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2017 Jun;21(11):2572-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.048]
29. 29 Kijima Y, Shinden Y, Hirata M, Natsugoe S. [ONCOPLASTIC BREAST SURGERY AND BREAST RECONSTRUCTION]. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 2016 Nov;117(6):503-8.
30. 30 Adams Jr WP, Lipschitz AH, Ansari M, Kenkel JM, Rohrich RJ. Functional donor site morbidity following latissimus dorsi muscle flap transfer. Ann Plast Surg 2004;53(1):6-11. [DOI:10.1097/01.sap.0000106430.56501.b5]
31. 31 Hamdi M, Craggs B, Stoel A-M, Hendrickx B, Zeltzer A. Superior epigastric artery perforator flap: anatomy, clinical applications, and review of literature. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014;30(07):475-82. [DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1376399]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
