مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
شنبه 8 اردیبهشت 1403
[Archive]
دوره 12، شماره 2 - ( 1402 )
جلد 12 شماره 2 صفحات 70-64 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shafaei Y, Tassallibakhsh M, Akhoondinasab M, Latifi N. Comparison of the Results of Delayed Repair of Flexor Pollicis Longus (FPL) Tendon with Tendon Transfer or with Tendon Graft. WJPS 2023; 12 (2) :64-70
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1102-fa.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1102-fa.html
Comparison of the Results of Delayed Repair of Flexor Pollicis Longus (FPL) Tendon with Tendon Transfer or with Tendon Graft. مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک. 1402; 12 (2) :64-70
چکیده: (1237 مشاهده)
Background: In Flexor Pollicis Longus (FPL) injuries, primary repair with end-to-end suture is the treatment of choice. In cases where primary repair is not possible, tendon transfer or tendon grafting is used, each of which has its strengths and weaknesses. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of each of the above two methods in patients.
Methods: Patients with FPL injury who referred to Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran late in 2020 to 2021, if primary tendon repair was not possible, were randomly repaired with tendon transfer or tendon graft. After the appropriate time, the splint was opened and physiotherapy was performed for the patients. Then, at least three months after the repair, the range of motion of the IP and MP joints of the patients thumb was measured and compared in two groups.
Results: Ten patients in the tendon transfer group and 10 patients in the tendon graft group were studied. In the secondary repair of FPL with tendon grafting, the range of motion of both IP and MP joints of the thumb was not significantly different compared to repair with tendon transfer.
Conclusion: The findings of this research confirm controversies in this field. In order to obtain more accurate results, it is suggested to carry out a research with a larger number of patients and with strict control over the surgical technique and post-operative care, as well as taking into account the morbidities caused by donor tendon removal and examining the overall satisfaction of the patients.
Methods: Patients with FPL injury who referred to Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran late in 2020 to 2021, if primary tendon repair was not possible, were randomly repaired with tendon transfer or tendon graft. After the appropriate time, the splint was opened and physiotherapy was performed for the patients. Then, at least three months after the repair, the range of motion of the IP and MP joints of the patients thumb was measured and compared in two groups.
Results: Ten patients in the tendon transfer group and 10 patients in the tendon graft group were studied. In the secondary repair of FPL with tendon grafting, the range of motion of both IP and MP joints of the thumb was not significantly different compared to repair with tendon transfer.
Conclusion: The findings of this research confirm controversies in this field. In order to obtain more accurate results, it is suggested to carry out a research with a larger number of patients and with strict control over the surgical technique and post-operative care, as well as taking into account the morbidities caused by donor tendon removal and examining the overall satisfaction of the patients.
فهرست منابع
1. Omranifard M, Abdali H, Shafaiee Y, Kabiri P, Aminpour F, Ansari AM, Jazebi N. Distraction osteogenesis in the hand with and without K-wire. J Res Med Sci 2012 Mar 1;17(5):1.
2. Ketchum LD, Martin NL, Kappel DA. Experimental evaluation of factors affecting the strength of tendon repairs. Plast Reconstr Sur 1977 May 1;59(5):708-19. [DOI:10.1097/00006534-197705000-00014]
3. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197705000-00014 [DOI:10.1097/00006534-197705000-00014]
4. Lister GD, Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, Atasoy E. Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization. J Hand Sur Am 1977 Nov 1;2(6):441-51. [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(77)80025-7]
5. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(77)80025-7 [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(77)80025-7]
6. Lundborg G, Rank F. Experimental intrinsic healing of flexor tendons based upon synovial fluid nutrition. J Hand Sur Am 1978 Jan 1;3(1):21-31. [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(78)80114-2]
7. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(78)80114-2 [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(78)80114-2]
8. Verdan CE. Half a century of flexor tendon surgery. Current status and changing philosophies. Plast Reconstr Sur 1973 Jan 1;51(1):105-6. [DOI:10.1097/00006534-197301000-00043]
9. Strickland JW. Flexor tendon injuries: I. Foundations of treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995 Jan 1;3(1):44-54. [DOI:10.5435/00124635-199501000-00006]
10. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199501000-00006 [DOI:10.5435/00124635-199501000-00006]
11. Strickland JW, Glogovac SV. Digital function following flexor tendon repair in zone II: a comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques. J Hand Sur Am 1980 Nov 1;5(6):537-43. [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(80)80101-8]
12. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(80)80101-8 [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(80)80101-8]
13. Cook PA, Nappi JF. Flexor pollicis longus lacerations. Oper Tech Orthop 1998 Apr 1;8(2):86-91. [DOI:10.1016/S1048-6666(98)80006-2]
14. doi: 10.1016/S1048-6666(98)80006-2 [DOI:10.1016/S1048-6666(98)80006-2]
15. Coyle Jr MP, Leddy TP, Leddy JP. Staged flexor tendon reconstruction fingertip to palm. J Hand Sur Am 2002 Jul 1;27(4):581-5. [DOI:10.1053/jhsu.2002.34319]
16. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2002.34319 [DOI:10.1053/jhsu.2002.34319]
17. Ebelin M, Le Viet D, Lemerle JP, Meriaux JL. Secondary surgery of the flexor pollicis longus tendon. A comparative study of forty-three cases. Ann Chir Main 1985 Jan 1;4(2):111-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0753-9053(85)80121-6]
18. doi: 10.1016/s0753-9053(85)80121-6 [DOI:10.1016/S0753-9053(85)80121-6]
19. Posner MA. Flexor superficialis tendon transfers to the thumb-an alternative to the free tendon graft for treatment of chronic injuries within the digital sheath. J Hand Sur Am 1983 Nov 1;8(6):876-81. [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(83)80086-0]
20. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(83)80086-0 [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(83)80086-0]
21. Wolfe SW, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Cohen MS. Green's operative hand surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017;1:217-223.
22. Apfelberg DB, Maser MR, Lash H, Keoshian L. "IP flexor lag" after thumb flexor reconstruction-Causes and solution. Hand 1980 Jun(2):167-72. [DOI:10.1016/S0072-968X(80)80009-X]
23. doi: 10.1016/s0072-968x(80)80009-x [DOI:10.1016/S0072-968X(80)80009-X]
24. McCULLOUGH Jr FH. Repair of the flexor pollicis longus tendon. U S Armed Forces Med J 1951 Oct 1;2(10):1579-91.
25. PMID: 14876827
26. URBANIAK JR, GOLDNER JL. Laceration of the flexor pollicis longus tendon: Delayed repair by advancement, free graft or direct suture: A clinical and experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973 Sep 1;55(6):1123-48. [DOI:10.2106/00004623-197355060-00001]
27. PMID: 4585945
28. Finsen V. Two-stage grafting of digital flexor tendons: a review of 43 patients after 3 to 15 years. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2003 Jan 1;37(3):159-62. [DOI:10.1080/03844310310007773]
29. doi: 10.1080/03844310310007773 [DOI:10.1080/03844310310007773]
30. LaSalle WB, Strickland JW. An evaluation of the two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction technique. J Hand Sur Am 1983 May 1;8(3):263-7. [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(83)80155-5]
31. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(83)80155-5 [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(83)80155-5]
32. Smith P, Jones M, Grobbelaar A. Two‐stage grafting of flexor tendons: results after mobilisation by controlled early active movement. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2004 Jan 1;38(4):220-7. [DOI:10.1080/02844310410024566]
33. doi: 10.1080/02844310410024566 [DOI:10.1080/02844310410024566]
34. Schneider LH, Wiltshire D. Restoration of flexor pollicis longus function by flexor digitorum superficialis transfer. J Hand Sur Am 1983 Jan 1;8(1):98-101. [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(83)80065-3]
35. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(83)80065-3 [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(83)80065-3]
36. Leversedge FJ, Zelouf D, Williams C, Gelberman RH, Seiler III JG. Flexor tendon grafting to the hand: an assessment of the intrasynovial donor tendon-a preliminary single-cohort study. J Hand Sur Am 2000 Jul 1;25(4):721-30. [DOI:10.1053/jhsu.2000.9413]
37. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.9413 [DOI:10.1053/jhsu.2000.9413]
38. Seiler 3rd JG, Gelberman RH, Williams CS, Woo SL, Dickersin GR, Sofranko R, Chu CR, Rosenberg AE. Autogenous flexor-tendon grafts. A biomechanical and morphological study in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993 Jul 1;75(7):1004-14. [DOI:10.2106/00004623-199307000-00006]
39. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199307000-00006 [DOI:10.2106/00004623-199307000-00006]
40. Stark HH, Anderson DR, Zemel NP, Boyes JH, Ashworth CR, Rickard TA. Bridge flexor tendon grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989 May; 1(242):51-9. [DOI:10.1097/00003086-198905000-00007]
41. PMID: 2650950
42. Ahmadi S, Akbari H, Shafaei Y, Akbari P. Trigger Thumb in Twins: Case Report. World J Plast Surg 2021 May;10(2):110. [DOI:10.52547/wjps.10.2.110]
43. doi: 10.29252/wjps.10.2.110
44. Rostami Mogaddam M, Safavi Ardabili N, Shafaeei Y, Maleki N, Jafari N, Jafari A. Overexpression of Drosha, DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8 (DGCR 8), and Dicer mRNA s in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. J Cosmet Dermatol 2017 Dec;16(4):e48-53. [DOI:10.1111/jocd.12336]
45. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12336 [DOI:10.1111/jocd.12336]
46. Strickland JW. Biologic rationale, clinical application, and results of early motion following flexor tendon repair. J Hand Ther 1989 Apr 1;2(2):71-83. [DOI:10.1016/S0894-1130(89)80045-6]
47. doi: 10.1016/S0894-1130(89)80045-6 [DOI:10.1016/S0894-1130(89)80045-6]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
