مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
جمعه 7 اردیبهشت 1403
[Archive]
دوره 10، شماره 3 - ( 1400 )
جلد 10 شماره 3 صفحات 110-104 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Alemrajabi M, Khavanin Zadeh M, Hemmati N, Banivaheb B, Alemrajabi F, Jahanian S, et al . Inferior Part of Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap Outcomes after Abdominoperineal Resection: A Case Series Pilot Study. WJPS 2021; 10 (3) :104-110
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-849-fa.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-849-fa.html
Inferior Part of Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap Outcomes after Abdominoperineal Resection: A Case Series Pilot Study. مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک. 1400; 10 (3) :104-110
چکیده: (2106 مشاهده)
BACKGROUND
The standard surgical treatment for low rectal cancer is abdominoperineal resection (APR). Comparing to primary closure, immediate flap reconstruction has shown to have good outcomes. We aimed to assess the inferior rectus abdominis muscle flap complications after APR surgery, a new method of reconstruction.
METHODS
This study was conducted from 2014 to 2016 in a single center in Firoozgar Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Eighteen patients who underwent pelvic floor closure with inferior part of abdominis rectus musculofascial flap were included enrolled. The sampling method used in this study was census. All patients had distal rectoanal malignancies. A checklist including age, gender, tumor location, complications after surgery, tumor type, length of hospital stay, length of operation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy history was filled for all patients.
RESULTS
Among 18 participants, 27.8% were female. The mean age of participants was 58.28 ± 17.86 yr (minimum of 19 and the maximum of 89 yr). The pathology of the tumor in all but one of the cases was adenocarcinoma (94.4%). The overall complication rate after surgery was 27.8%. In total, 80% received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In a one year follow-up, 16.8% of patients died.
CONCLUSION
Inferior part of rectus abdominis muscle flap was a reliable and comparable means of reconstruction after APR surgery with low rate of complications and mortality.
The standard surgical treatment for low rectal cancer is abdominoperineal resection (APR). Comparing to primary closure, immediate flap reconstruction has shown to have good outcomes. We aimed to assess the inferior rectus abdominis muscle flap complications after APR surgery, a new method of reconstruction.
METHODS
This study was conducted from 2014 to 2016 in a single center in Firoozgar Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Eighteen patients who underwent pelvic floor closure with inferior part of abdominis rectus musculofascial flap were included enrolled. The sampling method used in this study was census. All patients had distal rectoanal malignancies. A checklist including age, gender, tumor location, complications after surgery, tumor type, length of hospital stay, length of operation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy history was filled for all patients.
RESULTS
Among 18 participants, 27.8% were female. The mean age of participants was 58.28 ± 17.86 yr (minimum of 19 and the maximum of 89 yr). The pathology of the tumor in all but one of the cases was adenocarcinoma (94.4%). The overall complication rate after surgery was 27.8%. In total, 80% received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In a one year follow-up, 16.8% of patients died.
CONCLUSION
Inferior part of rectus abdominis muscle flap was a reliable and comparable means of reconstruction after APR surgery with low rate of complications and mortality.
فهرست منابع
1. 1 Shibata D, Hyland W, Busse P, et al. Immediate reconstruction of the perineal wound with gracilis muscle flaps following abdominoperineal resection and intraoperative radiation therapy for recurrent carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6(1):33-7. [DOI:10.1007/s10434-999-0033-4]
2. 2 Chessin DB, Hartley J, Cohen AM, et al. Rectus flap reconstruction decreases perineal wound complications after pelvic chemoradiation and surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2005 ;12(2):104-10. [DOI:10.1245/ASO.2005.03.100]
3. 3 Chan S, Miller M, Ng R, et al. Use of myocutaneous flaps for perineal closure following abdominoperineal excision of the rectum for adenocarcinoma. Colorectal Dis 2010;12(6):555-60. [DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01844.x]
4. 4 Howell AM, Jarral OA, Faiz O, Ziprin P, Darzi A, Zacharakis E. How should perineal wounds be closed following abdominoperineal resection in patients post radiotherapy--primary closure or flap repair? Best evidence topic (BET). Int J Surg 2013;11(7):514-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.05.004]
5. 5 Wang ED, Conkling N, Xu X, et al. Perineal flap reconstruction following oncologic anorectal extirpation: an outcomes assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135(1):176e-84e. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000837]
6. 6 Khoo AK, Skibber JM, Nabawi AS, et al. Indications for immediate tissue transfer for soft tissue reconstruction in visceral pelvic surgery. Surgery 2001;130(3):463-9. [DOI:10.1067/msy.2001.116416]
7. 7 Baird WL, Hester TR, Nahai F, Bostwick J, 3rd. Management of perineal wounds following abdominoperineal resection with inferior gluteal flaps. Arch Surg 1990;125(11):1486-9. [DOI:10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410230080014]
8. 8 Anthony JP, Mathes SJ. The recalcitrant perineal wound after rectal extirpation. Applications of muscle flap closure. Arch Surg 1990;125(10):1371-6; discussion 6-7. [DOI:10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410220155022]
9. 9 Kolehmainen M, Suominen S, Tukiainen E. Pelvic, perineal and genital reconstructions. Scand J Surg 2013;102(1):25-31. [DOI:10.1177/145749691310200106]
10. 10 Galandiuk S, Jorden J, Mahid S, McCafferty MH, Tobin G. The use of tissue flaps as an adjunct to pelvic surgery. Am J Surg 2005;190(2):186-90. [DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.009]
11. 11 Persichetti P, Cogliandro A, Marangi GF, et al. Pelvic and perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection: the role of gracilis flap. Ann Plast Surg 2007;59(2):168-72. [DOI:10.1097/01.sap.0000252693.53692.e0]
12. 12 Burke TW, Morris M, Roh MS, Levenback C, Gershenson DM. Perineal reconstruction using single gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Gynecol Oncol 1995;57(2):221-5. [DOI:10.1006/gyno.1995.1129]
13. 13 Carey JN, Sheckter CC, Watt AJ, Lee GK. Intra-abdominal pedicled rectus abdominis muscle flap for treatment of high-output enterocutaneous fistulae: case reports and review of literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013;66(8):1145-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2012.12.008]
14. 14 Touny A, Othman H, Maamoon S, Ramzy S, Elmarakby H. Perineal reconstruction using pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM). J Surg Oncol 2014;110(6):752-7. [DOI:10.1002/jso.23692]
15. 15 Kroll SS, Pollock R, Jessup JM, Ota D. Transpelvic rectus abdominis flap reconstruction of defects following abdominal-perineal resection. Am Surg 1989;55(10):632-7.
16. 16 McAllister E, Wells K, Chaet M, Norman J, Cruse W. Perineal reconstruction after surgical extirpation of pelvic malignancies using the transpelvic transverse rectus abdominal myocutaneous flap. Ann Surg Oncol 1994;1(2):164-8. [DOI:10.1007/BF02303561]
17. 17 Nelson RA, Butler CE. Surgical outcomes of VRAM versus thigh flaps for immediate reconstruction of pelvic and perineal cancer resection defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123(1):175-83. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181904df7]
18. 18 Pantelides NM, Davies RJ, Fearnhead NS, Malata CM. The gluteal fold flap: a versatile option for perineal reconstruction following anorectal cancer resection. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013;66(6):812-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2013.02.010]
19. 19 Windhofer C, Michlits W, Heuberger A, Papp C. Perineal reconstruction after rectal and anal disease using the local fascio-cutaneous-infragluteal flap: A new and reliable technique. Surgery 2011;149(2):284-90. [DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.040]
20. 20 Ducic I, Dayan JH, Attinger CE, Curry P. Complex perineal and groin wound reconstruction using the extended dissection technique of the gracilis flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122(2):472-8. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d607d]
21. 21 Alemrajabi M, Moradi S, Jahanian S, Banivaheb B, Hemmati N. Inferior part of rectus abdominis muscle flap: A case report. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic Of Iran 2019;33(1):666-9. [DOI:10.47176/mjiri.33.111]
22. 22 Azizi R, Alemrajabi M. Trends in surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus diseases: primary closure or flap? World J Surg 2012;36(7):1713. [DOI:10.1007/s00268-012-1551-y]
23. 23 Azizi R, Alemrajabi M, Naderan M, Shoar S. Efficacy of modified Limberg flap in surgical treatment of infected pilonidal abscess: a case-control study. European Surgery 2014;46(4):144-7. [DOI:10.1007/s10353-014-0273-9]
24. 24 Vahedian J, Jahanian S, Banivaheb B, et al. A New Method for Surgical Abdominal Mass Closure After Abdominal Fascial Dehiscence Using Nasogastric Tube and Hemovac Perforator: A Case-Series Study. World J Surg 2018;42(10):3106-11. [DOI:10.1007/s00268-018-4607-9]
25. 25 Sheckter CC, Shakir A, Vo H, Tsai J, Nazerali R, Lee GK. Reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection (APR): Indications and complications from a single institution experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016;69(11):1506-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.024]
26. 26 Horch RE, Hohenberger W, Eweida A, et al. A hundred patients with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap for pelvic reconstruction after total pelvic exenteration. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014;29(7):813-23. [DOI:10.1007/s00384-014-1868-0]
27. 27 Hinojosa MW, Parikh DA, Menon R, Wirth GA, Stamos MJ, Mills S. Recent experience with abdominal perineal resection with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction after preoperative pelvic radiation. Am Surg 2009;75(10):995-9. [DOI:10.1177/000313480907501029]
28. 28 Sunesen KG, Buntzen S, Tei T, Lindegaard JC, Norgaard M, Laurberg S. Perineal healing and survival after anal cancer salvage surgery: 10-year experience with primary perineal reconstruction using the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16(1):68-77. [DOI:10.1245/s10434-008-0208-4]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
