Volume 11, Issue 1 (3-2022)                   WJPS 2022, 11(1): 59-63 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

1. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Alex Ekwueme University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State Nigeria
Abstract:   (1383 Views)
Chronic wounds affect mainly the productive age group in developing countries and stretch the limited healthcare facility. We aimed to establish the efficacy or otherwise of pawpaw dressing in management of common forms of wounds in resource-poor settings using the Nigerian pawpaw in humans.
This study was a prospective research carried out at Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki Nigeria between September 2019 and August 2020 using patients with lower extremity wounds. Thirty patients who had lower extremity wounds that required debridement were enrolled in the study after giving consent. They had wound dressing with unripe pawpaw as an enzymatic debriding agent to evaluate the rapidity of eschar separation and bacterial clearance. The data obtained with a proforma were analyzed using IBM SPSS.
There were 16 males and 14 females with an average wound size of 127.13+ 103cm2. Eschar separation occurred earliest after 3 d of dressing and the latest after 14 d with a mean period of 5.5+ 2.255 days. A case had negative bacterial culture on the first test. Others had a variable period of clearance with a maximum of 18 d and a mean of 6.73+3.750 days. Both eschar separation and bacterial clearance correlated positively with the wound size.

Wound bed preparation with unripe pawpaw dressing showed promising outcomes with rapid eschar and slough separation, and bacterial clearance resulting in a faster wound healing. This is recommended for wounds needing debridement in which the patients are not fit for anesthesia or could not afford the cost of surgery.
Full-Text [PDF 230 kb]   (666 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/11/24 | Accepted: 2021/10/26 | Published: 2022/03/4

1. Gosselin RA, Spiegel DA, Coughlin Richard, Zirkle LG. Injuries: the neglected burden in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2009; 87(4):246. 2. Buck D W, Galiano R D. Wound Care. In: Thornes C H et al (Eds). Grabb and Smith’s Plastic Surgery (7th ed) . Philadelphia, U.S.A, LippincotWillians and Wilkins; 2007. Pg 20-28. 3. Rahman GA, Adigun IA, Fadeyi A. Epidemiology, etiology, and treatment of chronic leg ulcer: Experience with sixty patients. Ann Afr Med 2010; 9:1-4. 4. Manna B, Morrison CA. Wound Debridement. [Updatd 2020 Feb 14]. In: StatPearls[internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. 5. Jayarajan RC, Narayanan PV, Adenwalla HS. Papaya pulp for enzymatic wound debridement in burns. Indian J Burns 2016;24(1): 24-28. 6. Wienert V.Epidemiology of Leg Ulcers.In Hafner J et al (eds). Management of leg ulcers. Basel, Switzerland, Karger AG; 1999: 4-8. 7. Mork F. Cutaneous Ulcers, Sinuses and Fistulae. In Badoe EA et al (eds). Principles and Practice of Surgery including Pathology in the Tropics (4th ed). Accra, Ghana, Assemblies of God Literature Centre Ltd; 2009: 70-82. 8. Sen CK, Roy Sashwati. Wound healing. In: Gurtner GC. Plastic Surgery (3rd ed. Vol.1). USA, Elsevier; 2013:254-255 9. Osunwoke EA, Oladopo OO, Zamide EI, Oladipo GS. A study on some effects of the extracts of unripe pawpaw (Carica papaya linn) on wound healing in Wistar rats. Port Harcourt Med J 2009;3(3). 10. Wikipedia.org. List of countries by papaya production. htpps://en.m.wikipedia.org. 11. Sen CK. Human wounds and its burden: Updated compendium of estimates. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 14 Feb 2019;8(2):39-48. 12. Maduba CC, Nnadozie UU, Modekwe VI, Nwankwo EU. Comparing hospital stay and patient satisfaction in a resource poor setting using conventional and locally adapted negative pressure wound dressing methods in management of leg ulcers with skin grafts: a comparative prospective study. Pan Afr Med J 2020;36:105 [doi:10.11604/pamj.2020.36.105.19961] 13. Maduba CC, Nnadozie UU, Modekwe VI, Onah II. Split Skin Graft take in leg ulcers: Conventional Versus Locally adapted negative pressure dressing. J Surg Res 2020;251:296-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.01.029. 14. Bode CO, Ademuyiwa AO, Elebute OA. Formal saline versus honey as escharotics in the conservative management of major omphaloceles. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal 2018;25(1):48-51 15. Milne CT, Ciccarelli AO, Lassy M. Acomparison of collagenase to hydrogel dressing in wound debridement. Wounds 2010;22(11). 16. Murthy MB, Murthy BK, Bhave S. comparison of safety and efficacy of papaya dressing with hydrogen peroxide solution on wound bed preparation in patients with gape wound. Ind J Pharm 2012;44(6):784-787 17. Emeruwa AC. Antibacterial substance from Carica papaya fruit extract. J Nat Prod 1982;45(2):123-127 18. Biglari B, vd Linden PH, Simon A, Aytac S, Gerner HJ, Moghaddam A. Use of medihoney as a non-surgical therapy for chronic pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2012;50(2):165-169. 19. Carpenter S, Shaffett TP. Choosing the best debridement modality to battle necrotic tissue: Pros & Cons. Today’s Wound Clinic 2017;11(7). 20. Waycaster C, Milne CT. Clinical and economic benefit of enzymatic debridement of pressure ulcers compared to autolytic debridement with a hydrogel dressing. J Med Econ 2013; 16(7)976-986. https://doi:10.3111/13696998.2013.807268. [DOI:10.1089/wound2019.0946.]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.