Volume 11, Issue 1 (3-2022)                   WJPS 2022, 11(1): 44-50 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Abstract:   (1074 Views)
BACKGROUND
Increasing success rates of supermicrosurgery operations have increased the importance of developing the ideal training model for super-microsurgery. Working on the model is very important for increasing and continuing microsurgery and supermicrosurgery skills. We aimed to present a standardized, simple and easy to access live training model for supermicrosurgery.
METHODS
The experiment was performed in the University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, IDEA, Istanbul, Turkey in 2020. Twelve BALB/c male albino mice weighing 20-45 gr were used in the study. Unilateral femoral artery, vein and nerve diameters of mice were measured. Anastomosis was performed on the bilateral femoral vessels. The surgical procedure times were also recorded.
RESULTS
The mean weight of the mice was 36.6 ± 6.09 gr, the length was 15.10 ± 1.10 cm. The mean external diameter of the femoral artery, vein and nerves were 0.31 ± 0.34 mm, 0.48 ± 0.70 mm, 0.38 ± 0.43 mm, respectively. The mean preparation time of neurovascular structures for anastomosis was 15.75 ± 1.54 min, mean femoral artery and vein anastomosis time was 24.91±1.72 and 33.16±1.74 min, respectively. Vascular patency was detected as 100% after all vascular anastomosis procedures.
CONCLUSION
Mice femoral neurovascular structures are similar to rats in terms of basic morphology, and they are small enough for super-microsurgery education model. Dissection of mice femoral bundles are easy to perform. In terms of training models, anesthetic requirement and laboratory costs are less for mice, and handling them is much easier compared to rats; thus, making them especially suitable for basic supermicrosurgery training courses.
Full-Text [PDF 1007 kb]   (673 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/12/30 | Accepted: 2021/10/26 | Published: 2022/03/4

References
1. Daniel RK, Taylor GI. Distant transfer of an island flap by microvascular anastomoses. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973;52:111-117. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197308000-00001. 2. Taylor G, Palmer J. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 1987;40:113-141. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(87)90185-8. 3. Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 1989;42:645-648. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(89)90075-1. 4. Clodius L, Smith P, Bruna J, Serafin D. The lymphatics of the groin flap. Ann Plast Surg 1982;9:447-458. doi: 10.1097/00000637-198212000-00001. 5. Koshima I, Inagawa K, Urushibara K, Moriguchi T. Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema in the upper extremities. J Reconstr Microsurg 2000;16:437-442. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-947150. 6. Koshima I, Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Mihara M, Iida T. Perforator flaps and supermicrosurgery. Clin Plast Surg 2010;37:683-689. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2010.06.009 7. Park JE, Chang DW. Advances and Innovations in Microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;138:915e-924e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002715. 8. Pafitanis G, Narushima M, Yamamoto T, Raveendran M, Veljanoski D, Ghanem MA, Myers S, Koshima I. Evolution of an evidence-based supermicrosurgery simulation training curriculum: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018;71:976-988. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.04.005. 9. Komatsu S, Yamada K, Yamashita S, Sugiyama N, Tokuyama E, Matsumoto K, Takara A, Kimata Y. Evaluation of the microvascular research center training program for assessing microsurgical skills in trainee surgeons. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40:214-219. doi: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.3.214. 10. Bas CE, Cwykiel J, Siemionow M. A New Supermicrosurgery Training Model of Saphenous Artery and Great Saphenous Vein Anastomosis for Development of Advanced Microsurgical Skills. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017;33:426-434. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599101. 11. Matsumura N, Horie Y, Shibata T, Kubo M, Hayashi N, Endo S. Basic training model for supermicrosurgery: a novel practice card model. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011;27:377-382. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281518. 12. Chen WF, Eid A, Yamamoto T, Keith J, Nimmons GL, Lawrence WT. A novel supermicrosurgery training model: the chicken thigh. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67:973-978. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.03.024. 13. Nagase T, Gonda K, Inoue K, Higashino T, Fukuda N, Gorai K, Mihara M, Nakanishi M, Koshima I.Treatment of lymphedema with lymphaticovenular anastomoses. Int J Clin Oncol 2005;10:304-310. doi: 10.1007/s10147-005-0518-5. 14. Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Yamashita M, Furuya M, Hayashi A, Koshima I. Establishment of supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis model in rat. Microsurgery 2017;37:57-60. doi: 10.1002/micr.22335. 15. Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Yoshimatsu H, Yamamoto N, Mihara M, Koshima I. Free anterolateral thigh flap with vascularized lateral femoral cutaneous nerve for the treatment of neuroma-in-continuity and recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome after carpal tunnel release. Microsurgery 2014;34:145-148. doi: 10.1002/micr.22135. 16. Koshima I, Narushima M, Mihara M, Uchida G, Nakagawa M. Fascicular turnover flap for nerve gaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1008-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.02.083. 17. Ozkan O, Koshima I, Gonda K. A supermicrosurgical flap model in the rat: a free true abdominal perforator flap with a short pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:479-485. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000197215.94170.b8. 18. Yamashita S, Sugiyama N, Hasegawa K, Namba Y, Kimata Y. A novel model for supermicrosurgery training: the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap in rats. J Reconstr Microsurg 2008;24:537-543. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1088226. 19. Demir Y, Ozmen S, Klimczak A, Mukherjee AL, Siemionow M. Tolerance induction in composite facial allograft transplantation in the rat model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1790-1801. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000142414.92308.ab. 20. Sonmez E, Nasir S, Siemionow M. Penis allotransplantation model in the rat. Ann Plast Surg 2009;62:304-310. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31817dc4d8. 21. Ha Y, Song SH, Kang NH, Oh SH. Proper Choice of Vessels for Supermicrosurgery Training: An Experimental Animal study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018;34:742-748. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1648221. 22. Uehara M, Wei Min W, Satoh M, Shimizu F. Fascicular turnover flap in the reconstruction of facial nerve defects: an experimental study in rats. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2019;53:155-160. doi. 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1562458. 23. Irintchev A. Potentials and limitations of peripheral nerve injury models in rodents with particular reference to the femoral nerve. Ann Anat 2011;193:276-285. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.02.019. 24. Griffin JW, Pan B, Polley MA, Hoffman PN, Farah MH. Measuring nerve regeneration in the mouse. Exp Neurol 2010;223:60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.12.033. 25. Huang C-D, Chow S, Chan C. Experience with anastomoses of arteries approximately 0.20 mm in external diameter. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;69:299-305. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198202000-00020. 26. Cooley BC, Daley R. Free flap transplantation in mice. Microsurgery 1998;18:320-323. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2752(1998)18:5<320::aid-micr4>3.0.co;2-2.  

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.