Volume 11, Issue 1 (2022)
WJPS 2022, 11(1): 51-58 |
Back to browse issues page
Majid Eshghpour1 
, Zahra Shooshtari2 , Ali Labafchi3 , Nazgol Radvar3 , Elahe Tohidi4 , Sahand Samieirad 1
, Zahra Shooshtari2 , Ali Labafchi3 , Nazgol Radvar3 , Elahe Tohidi4 , Sahand Samieirad 1
1- OMFS, Associate Professor, Oral and maxillofacial diseases research center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
2- Dentistry Student, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3- Dentists, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4- Radiologist, Oral and maxillofacial diseases research center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
2- Dentistry Student, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3- Dentists, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4- Radiologist, Oral and maxillofacial diseases research center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Abstract: (2282 Views)
BACKGROUND
We aimed to evaluate the possibility of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction following mandibular advancement surgery in skeletal class 2 patients.
Methods: All healthy non-syndromic patients with Class 2 deformity, who were eligible for mandibular advancement surgery, were included in this before-after quasi-experimental study. The main intervention was mandibular advancement through bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Maxillary impaction or setback surgery using LeFort 1 osteotomy was simultaneously performed in some cases. Variables such as TMJ pain, clicking, crepitus, or any other type of sounds or complaint as well as the amount of maximum mouth opening (MMO) were evaluated before surgery and two months postoperatively.
Results: Thirty patients including 15 men and 15 women with a mean age of 23.3 ±2.7 yr were studied. The mean amount of mandibular advancement displacement was 3.30 ± 0.87 mm. The rate of TMJ dysfunctions and complaints was relatively low two months postoperatively when compared to the preoperative state. Postoperative evaluation demonstrated that there was no significant correlation between the presence of TMJ symptoms and dysfunctions and the type of surgery. After treatment was completed, the mean MMO reduced significantly from 39.03±5.86 to 38.12±6.05 (P<0.001).
Conclusion: Mandibular advancement with BSSO surgery in skeletal class 2 patients did not clinically lead to TMJ dysfunctions. Among all the investigated factors, only preoperative pain, noises, or complaints were proven to have predictive value for postoperative TMJ dysfunction.
We aimed to evaluate the possibility of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction following mandibular advancement surgery in skeletal class 2 patients.
Methods: All healthy non-syndromic patients with Class 2 deformity, who were eligible for mandibular advancement surgery, were included in this before-after quasi-experimental study. The main intervention was mandibular advancement through bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Maxillary impaction or setback surgery using LeFort 1 osteotomy was simultaneously performed in some cases. Variables such as TMJ pain, clicking, crepitus, or any other type of sounds or complaint as well as the amount of maximum mouth opening (MMO) were evaluated before surgery and two months postoperatively.
Results: Thirty patients including 15 men and 15 women with a mean age of 23.3 ±2.7 yr were studied. The mean amount of mandibular advancement displacement was 3.30 ± 0.87 mm. The rate of TMJ dysfunctions and complaints was relatively low two months postoperatively when compared to the preoperative state. Postoperative evaluation demonstrated that there was no significant correlation between the presence of TMJ symptoms and dysfunctions and the type of surgery. After treatment was completed, the mean MMO reduced significantly from 39.03±5.86 to 38.12±6.05 (P<0.001).
Conclusion: Mandibular advancement with BSSO surgery in skeletal class 2 patients did not clinically lead to TMJ dysfunctions. Among all the investigated factors, only preoperative pain, noises, or complaints were proven to have predictive value for postoperative TMJ dysfunction.
References
1. Castro VA, Pereira RMA, Mascarenhas GM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of articular disk position after orthognathic surgery with or without concomitant disk repositioning: a retrospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2021;131(3):276-85.
2. Paunonen J, Helminen M, Sipilä K, Peltomäki T. Temporomandibular disorders in Class II malocclusion patients after surgical mandibular advancement treatment as compared to non-treated patients. J Oral Rehabil 2019;46(7):605-10.
3. Bermell-Baviera A, Bellot-Arcís C, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM. Effects of mandibular advancement surgery on the temporomandibular joint and muscular and articular adaptive changes--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45(5):545-52.
4. 4 Catherine Z, Breton P, Bouletreau P. Condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery: A systematic review. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale 2016;117(1):3-10.
5. Miao Z, Wang XD, Mao LX, et al. Influence of temporomandibular joint disc displacement on mandibular advancement in patients without pre-treatment condylar resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;46(3):328-36.
6. Nogami S, Yamauchi K, Satomi N, et al. Risk factors related to aggressive condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery for females: retrospective study. Cranio 2017;35(4):250-8.
7. Wahl N. Orthodontics in 3 millennia. Chapter 13: the temporomandibular joint and orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(2):263-7.
8. Wolford LM, Reiche-Fischel O, Mehra P. Changes in temporomandibular joint dysfunction after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003 Jun;61(6):655-60; discussion 61.
9. Zhai Y, Han JJ, Jung S, Kook MS, Park HJ, Oh HK. Changes in the temporomandibular joint clicking and pain disorders after orthognathic surgery: Comparison of orthodontics-first approach and surgery-first approach. PLoS One 2020;15(9):e0238494.
10. Friscia M, Sbordone C, Petrocelli M, et al. Complications after orthognathic surgery: our experience on 423 cases. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;21(2):171-7.
11. Mirow E, Sifakakis I, Keilig L, et al. Quantitative appraisal of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy impact on the loading of temporomandibular joint. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2020;111:103985.
12. Bergamaschi IP, Cavalcante RC, Fanderuff M, et al. Orthognathic surgery in class II patients: a longitudinal study on quality of life, TMD, and psychological aspects. Clin Oral Investig 2021 7.
13. Ureturk EU, Apaydin A. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement? J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018;46(6):923-31.
14. Moenning JE, Bussard DA, Lapp TH, Garrison BT. Comparison of relapse in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies for mandibular advancement: rigid internal fixation (screws) versus inferior border wiring with anterior skeletal fixation. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1990;5(3):175-82.
15. Arpornmaeklong P, Shand JM, Heggie AA. Skeletal stability following maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004 ;33(7):656-63.
16. Blomqvist JE, Ahlborg G, Isaksson S, Svartz K. A comparison of skeletal stability after mandibular advancement and use of two rigid internal fixation techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55(6):568-74; discussion 74-5.
17. Blomqvist JE, Isaksson S. Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement: a comparison of two rigid internal fixation techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52(11):1133-7.
18. Eggensperger N, Smolka K, Luder J, Iizuka T. Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35(1):36-42.
19. Al-Moraissi EA, Wolford LM, Perez D, Laskin DM, Ellis E, 3rd. Does Orthognathic Surgery Cause or Cure Temporomandibular Disorders? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75(9):1835-47.
20. Te Veldhuis EC, Te Veldhuis AH, Bramer WM, Wolvius EB, Koudstaal MJ. The effect of orthognathic surgery on the temporomandibular joint and oral function: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;46(5):554-63.
21. Borstlap WA, Stoelinga PJ, Hoppenreijs TJ, van't Hof MA. Stabilisation of sagittal split advancement osteotomies with miniplates: a prospective, multicentre study with two-year follow-up. Part II. Radiographic parameters. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;33(6):535-42.
22. Douma E, Kuftinec MM, Moshiri F. A comparative study of stability after mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100(2):141-55.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |