مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
جمعه 31 فروردین 1403
[Archive]
دوره 11، شماره 2 - ( 1401 )
جلد 11 شماره 2 صفحات 128-117 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rasti M, Talebian E. Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Satisfaction of Rhinoplasty with or without Smasectomy with the Aim of
Thinning the Nasal Tip in Patients with Thick Nasal Skin. WJPS 2022; 11 (2) :117-128
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-925-fa.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-925-fa.html
Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Satisfaction of Rhinoplasty with or without Smasectomy with the Aim of
Thinning the Nasal Tip in Patients with Thick Nasal Skin. مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک. 1401; 11 (2) :117-128
چکیده: (1961 مشاهده)
Abstract
Background: Rhinoplasty is one of the most common plastic surgeries and a challenging procedure for people with thick nasal skin. There are several techniques to improve the outcome of the operation.
Methods: Our study is a double-blind randomized controlled trial conducted in Esfahan, Iran in 2020. Seventy participants were equally divided into two groups (35 people). In the control group, only rhinoplasty was performed without SMASectomy and in the intervention group, rhinoplasty was performed with SMASectomy. The results were obtained and the satisfaction of patients and physicians was collected through patient examination and a questionnaire. Statistical analysis of data was calculated by SPSS software version 23 at a significance level of less than 0.05.
Results: The mean total skin thickness before surgery in the two groups was equally, which showed a significant difference between the two groups at after 12 months (P <0.05). Comparison of 3, 6 and 12 months after rhinoplasty in the two groups showed that the percentage of patient, doctor, hairdresser and nurse satisfaction, in 12 months after rhinoplasty, in the intervention group compared to the control group had a significant increase (P <0.05). Furthermore, in the control group 2.85% and in the intervention group 5.71% bleeding was observed. No other complications were observed in any of the groups.
Conclusion: Overall, SMASectomy, which is performed simultaneously with rhinoplasty, is considered as an important technique in rhinoplasty. As we observed in our study, the complications of these surgeries in patients were very small.
Background: Rhinoplasty is one of the most common plastic surgeries and a challenging procedure for people with thick nasal skin. There are several techniques to improve the outcome of the operation.
Methods: Our study is a double-blind randomized controlled trial conducted in Esfahan, Iran in 2020. Seventy participants were equally divided into two groups (35 people). In the control group, only rhinoplasty was performed without SMASectomy and in the intervention group, rhinoplasty was performed with SMASectomy. The results were obtained and the satisfaction of patients and physicians was collected through patient examination and a questionnaire. Statistical analysis of data was calculated by SPSS software version 23 at a significance level of less than 0.05.
Results: The mean total skin thickness before surgery in the two groups was equally, which showed a significant difference between the two groups at after 12 months (P <0.05). Comparison of 3, 6 and 12 months after rhinoplasty in the two groups showed that the percentage of patient, doctor, hairdresser and nurse satisfaction, in 12 months after rhinoplasty, in the intervention group compared to the control group had a significant increase (P <0.05). Furthermore, in the control group 2.85% and in the intervention group 5.71% bleeding was observed. No other complications were observed in any of the groups.
Conclusion: Overall, SMASectomy, which is performed simultaneously with rhinoplasty, is considered as an important technique in rhinoplasty. As we observed in our study, the complications of these surgeries in patients were very small.
فهرست منابع
1. Muslu U, Demir E. Development of Rhinoplasty: Yesterday and Today. Med Sci 2019, 23(97), 294-301.
2. Çakir B, Doğan T, Öreroğlu AR, Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: surface aesthetics and surgical techniques. Aesthet Surg J 2013 Mar;33(3):363-75. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13478968. PMID: 23515380. [DOI:10.1177/1090820X13478968] [PMID]
3. Park SS. Fundamental principles in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2011 Jun;4(2):55-66. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2011.4.2.55. Epub 2011 May 31. PMID: 21716951; PMCID: PMC3109328. [DOI:10.3342/ceo.2011.4.2.55] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Guyuron B, Lee M. An Effective Algorithm for Management of Noses with Thick Skin. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017 Apr;41(2):381-387. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-0779-1. Epub 2017 Jan 27. PMID: 28127662. [DOI:10.1007/s00266-017-0779-1] [PMID]
5. Layliev J, Gupta V, Kaoutzanis C, Ganesh Kumar N, Winocour J, Grotting JC, Higdon KK. Incidence and Preoperative Risk Factors for Major Complications in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Analysis of 4978 Patients. Aesthet Surg J 2017 Jul 1;37(7):757-767. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx023. PMID: 28472446. [DOI:10.1093/asj/sjx023] [PMID]
6. Kim MH, Baik BS, Yang WS, Ha W, Ji SY. Sepsis Leading to Mortality after Augmentation Rhinoplasty with a Septal Extension Graft and Fat Grafting. Arch Plast Surg 2016 May;43(3):295-6. doi: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.3.295. Epub 2016 May 18. PMID: 27218033; PMCID: PMC4876164. [DOI:10.5999/aps.2016.43.3.295] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Li Z, Shi R, Wu H, Yan P. First Identification of a Patient with Prosthesis-Related Infection Caused by an MCR-1.1-Producing ST131 Escherichia coli After Rhinoplasty. Infect Drug Resist 2021 Jan 26;14:249-257. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S295801. PMID: 33531821; PMCID: PMC7847383. [DOI:10.2147/IDR.S295801] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Sharifzadeh Kermani M, Shamsadini A, Fazeli F, Ahmadi M, Dehghani A, Salajegheh Sh. Comparison of Different Concentrations of Epinephrine on Hemodynamic Changes and Bleeding after Rhinoplasty in Patients under General Anesthesia. Med Edu Bull 2021;2(1):16171.DOI:10.22034/MEB.2021.298264.1021.
9. Ors S, Ozkose M. Late postoperative massive bleeding in septorhinoplasty: A prospective study. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2016 Summer;24(2):96-8. doi: 10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000963. Epub 2016 May 27. PMID: 27441192; PMCID: PMC4942243. [DOI:10.1177/229255031602400209] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Hashemi M. Comparative Study of Ecchymosis Due to Nasal Bone Osteotomy in Internal Continuos and External Perforated Techniques. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2005; 13 (51) :1-6.
11. Torres JR, Córdova LG, Saravia V, Arvelaez J, Castro JS. Nasal Skin Necrosis: An Unexpected New Finding in Severe Chikungunya Fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 1;62(1):78-81. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ718. Epub 2015 Sep 29. PMID: 26423381. [DOI:10.1093/cid/civ718] [PMID]
12. Mrad MA, Almarghoub MA. Skin Necrosis following Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019 Feb 8;7(2):e2077. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002077. PMID: 30881829; PMCID: PMC6416127. [DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002077] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Heilbronn C, Cragun D, Wong BJF. Complications in Rhinoplasty: A Literature Review and Comparison with a Survey of Consent Forms. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2020 Jan/Feb;22(1):50-56.doi:10.1089/fpsam.2019.29007.won. PMID: 32053419. [DOI:10.1089/fpsam.2019.29007.won] [PMID]
14. Alsubeeh NA, AlSaqr MA, Alkarzae M, Aldosari B. Prevalence of considering revision rhinoplasty in Saudi patients and its associated factors. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2019 Dec 10;41(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40902-019-0237-x. PMID: 31879662; PMCID: PMC6904703. [DOI:10.1186/s40902-019-0237-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Seyed Resuli A. Is Pitanguy's ligament a true ligament? A prospective cohort study. J Surg Med 2020; 4(4): 251-254. doi:10.28982/josam.711748. [DOI:10.28982/josam.711748]
16. Han, SK. (2013). Anatomy of the Dermocartilaginous Ligament of the Nose. In: Shiffman, M., Di Giuseppe, A. (eds) Advanced Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-28053-5_3]
17. Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976 Jul;58(1):80-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197607000-00013. PMID: 935283. [DOI:10.1097/00006534-197607000-00013] [PMID]
18. Davis RE, Wayne I. Rhinoplasty and the nasal SMAS augmentation graft: advantages and indications. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004 Mar-Apr;6(2):124-32. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.6.2.124. PMID: 15023801. [DOI:10.1001/archfaci.6.2.124] [PMID]
19. Alharethy S, Mousa A, Alharbi A, Aldrees T, AlQaryan S, Ju Jang Y. Does skin thickness affect satisfaction post rhinoplasty? Middle Eastern population as an example. Saudi Med J 2018 Dec;39(12):1238-1241. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.12.23269. PMID: 30520507; PMCID: PMC6344664. [DOI:10.15537/smj.2018.12.23269] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Jomah J, Elsafi RA, Ali KSAE, Abdullah R, Gelidan AG. Nasal Skin Thickness Measurements Using Computed Tomography in an Adult Saudi Population. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019 Sep 30;7(9):e2450. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002450. PMID: 31942407; PMCID: PMC6908396. [DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002450] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Cho GS, Kim JH, Yeo NK, Kim SH, Jang YJ. Nasal skin thickness measured using computed tomography and its effect on tip surgery outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011 Apr;144(4):522-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599811398936. Epub 2011 Feb 14. PMID: 21493228. [DOI:10.1177/0194599811398936] [PMID]
22. Faber C, Larson K, Amirlak B, Guyuron B. Use of desmopressin for unremitting epistaxis following septorhinoplasty and turbinectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011Dec;128(6):728e732e.doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230bf39. PMID: 22094773. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230bf39] [PMID]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
