دوره 11، شماره 2 - ( 5-1401 )                   جلد 11 شماره 2 صفحات 116-110 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kazemian M, Moghaddam N G, Anbiaee N, Kermani H, Samiee Rad S. The Clinical and Radiographic Changes of Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Following Mandibular Set Back Surgery by Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO). WJPS. 2022; 11 (2) :110-116
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-939-fa.html
The Clinical and Radiographic Changes of Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Following Mandibular Set Back Surgery by Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO). مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک. 1401; 11 (2) :116-110

URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-939-fa.html


چکیده:   (487 مشاهده)
Background
Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO) is one of the treatment options for Class III maxillary deficiency which may affect the condylar position and the patient's occlusion. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic changes of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) following mandibular set back surgery by BSSO.
Methods
In this retrospective study, All Class III patients, aged between 18-30 years old who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Ward of Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad, Iran from January 2018- January 2020 were enrolled. Radiographic changes of joint space, condylar position and clinical changes for maximal mouth opening and joint sound were examined before and 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed by SPSS16 software and the significance level of the data was set at P-value < 0.05.
Results
Twenty-five patients were recruited. The axial angle of the left and right condyle and condylar inclination on both sides reduced but this reduction was not statistically significant. While the anterior joint space was reduced and posterior joint space was increased in both sides, the changes on the right side were only significant (P = 0.039). In clinical examinations maximum mouth opening, lateral and protrusive movements were also decreased but this reduction was not statistically significant.
Conclusion
The mandibular set back with BSSO surgery in class III skeletal patients had no significant effect on the position of the condyle in the glenoid fossa as well as clinical symptoms.
 
     
نوع مطالعه: مقالات اصيل | موضوع مقاله: تخصصي
دریافت: 1401/4/24 | پذیرش: 1401/4/28 | انتشار: 1401/5/8

فهرست منابع
1. Kobayashi T, Honma K, Izumi K, Hayashi T, Shingaki S, Nakajima T. Temporomandibular joint symptoms and disc displacement in patients with mandibular prognathism. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;37(6):455-458. [DOI:10.1054/bjom.1999.0016] [PMID]
2. Al-Belasy FA, Tozoglu S, Dolwick MF. Mandibular hypomobility after orthognathic surgery: a review article. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71(11):1967 e1- e11. [DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2013.06.217] [PMID]
3. Hupp J, Ellis E, Tucker M. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. 5th ed. Missouri: Mosby; 2008; pp. 529-38 .
4. Firoozeai A, Momeni H, Shahnaseri S. Impact of orthognathic surgery on articular disc position in skeletal CL II patients. JIDS 2009;4(1):38-44.
5. Hupp JR TM, Ellis III E. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013; pp. 529-38
6. Dujoncquoy JP, Ferri J, Raoul G, Kleinheinz J. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction and orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study. Head Face Med 2010;6(1):17-23. [DOI:10.1186/1746-160X-6-27] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Yoon SY, Song JM, Kim YD, Chung IK, Shin SH. Clinical changes of TMD and condyle stability after two aw surgery with and without preceding TMD treatments in class III patients. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;37(1):9. [DOI:10.1186/s40902-015-0008-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014; pp.130-42.
9. Ueki K, Moroi A, Sotobori M, Ishihara Y, Marukawa K, Takatsuka S, et al. A hypothesis on the desired postoperative position of the condyle in orthognathic surgery: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;114(5):567-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2011.12.026] [PMID]
10. White SC PM. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014;pp. 137-49.
11. Panetta D. Advances in X-ray detectors for clinical and preclinical Computed Tomography. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res 2016;809:2-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.nima.2015.10.034]
12. Rhee CH, Choi YK, Kim YI, Kim SS, Park SB, Son WS. Correlation between skeletal and dental changes after mandibular setback surgery-first orthodontic treatment: Cone-beam computed tomography-generated half-cephalograms. Korean J Orthod 2014;45(2):59-65. [DOI:10.4041/kjod.2015.45.2.59] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Eshghpour M SB, Shahakbari R, Mahvelati Shamsabadi R, Nejat AH. Complications of Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy in Patients with Mandibular Prognathism. JDMT 2013 Dec 22;3(1):1-10.
14. Fang B, Shen GF, Yang C, Wu Y, Feng YM, Mao LX, et al. Changes in condylar and joint disc positions after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38(7):726-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.03.001] [PMID]
15. Kim YI, Jung YH, Cho BH, Kim JR, Kim SS, Son WS, et al. The assessment of the short- and long-term changes in the condylar position following sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with rigid fixation. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37(4):262-70. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02056.x] [PMID]
16. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Santler G, Karcher H, Simbrunner J. Clinical and magnetic resonance findings in the temporomandibular joints of patients before and after orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;37(1):41-5. [DOI:10.1054/bjom.1998.0387] [PMID]
17. Rubin MS, Clouston S, Ahmed MM, K ML, Shetye PR, Broder HL, et al. Assessment of presurgical clefts and predicted surgical outcome in patients treated with and without nasoalveolar molding. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26(1):71-5. [DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000001233] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Choi BJ, Choi YH, Lee BS, Kwon YD, Choo YJ, Ohe JY. A CBCT study on positional change in mandibular condyle according to metallic anchorage methods in skeletal class III patients after orthognatic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42(8):1617-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2014.05.001] [PMID]
19. Kim YJ, Lee Y, Chun YS, Kang N, Kim SJ, Kim M. Condylar positional changes up to 12 months after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III malocclusions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72(1):145-56. [DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.031] [PMID]
20. Ueki K, Moroi A, Sotobori M, Ishihara Y, Marukawa K, Yoshizawa K, et al. Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40(8):821-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2012.03.003] [PMID]
21. Ueki K, Nakagawa K, Marukawa K, Yamamoto E, Takeuchi N. Stress change on the temporomandibular joint in mandibular prognathism subjects with asymmetry after orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 2010;32(5):522-529. [DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjp143] [PMID]
22. Freihofer HP, Jr., Petresevic D. Late results after advancing the mandible by sagittal splitting of the rami. J Maxillofac Surg 1975;3(4):250-7. [DOI:10.1016/S0301-0503(75)80051-8]
23. Hu J, Wang D, Zou S. Effects of mandibular setback on the temporomandibular joint: a comparison of oblique and sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58(4):375-80; discussion 380-1. [DOI:10.1016/S0278-2391(00)90915-7]
24. Will LA, Joondeph DR, Hohl TH, West RA. Condylar position following mandibular advancement: its relationship to relapse. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;42(9):578-88. [DOI:10.1016/0278-2391(84)90088-0]
25. Chen S, Lei J, Wang X, Fu KY, Farzad P, Yi B. Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71(11):1956-66. [DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2013.06.213] [PMID]
26. Ghang MH, Kim HM, You JY, Kim BH, Choi JP, Kim SH, et al. Three-dimensional mandibular change after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a semirigid sliding plate system for fixation of a mandibular setback surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;115(2):157-66. [DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2012.02.022] [PMID]
27. Shaban B, Eshghpour M, Yaghoobi M, Shahriar F, Esmaeili H. Evaluation of Maximum Mouth Opening after Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy in Patients with Mandibular Prognathism. JDMT 2011;35(1):43-50.
28. Moore KE, Gooris PJ, Stoelinga PJ. The contributing role of condylar resorption to skeletal relapse following mandibular advancement surgery: report of five cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49(5):448-60. [DOI:10.1016/0278-2391(91)90166-J]
29. Arnett GW, Tomborello J. Progressive class II development: female idiopathic condylar resorption. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1990 Nov;2:699-716. [DOI:10.1016/S1042-3699(20)30456-8]
30. Wolford LM, Reiche-Fischel O, Mehra P. Changes in temporomandibular joint dysfunction after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61(6):655-660. [DOI:10.1053/joms.2003.50131] [PMID]

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | World Journal of Plastic Surgery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb