Showing 3 results for Sagittal Split Osteotomy
Majid Eshghpour, Ali Labafchi, Sahand Samieirad, Majid Hosseini Abrishami, Elham Nodehi, Abdollah Rashid Javan,
Volume 10, Issue 1 (1-2021)
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The possibility of mandibular bad spilt might happen during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). This study investigated the effect of impacted mandibular third molars on bad spilt incidence during BSSO.
METHODS
Totally, 140 patients under 40 years old who were candidates for BSSO surgery due to class 3 skeletal discrepancy were divided randomly into two equal groups. The impacted mandibular third molars were presented in one group during BSSO (Exposed), and the third molars were removed at least six months before surgery for the other group (Unexposed). All cases underwent BSSO using the same technique by a single surgeon. A bad split was diagnosed by inter-operative clinical examination and postoperative panoramic radiography.
RESULTS
Four bad split occurrences were observed including three patients in the group which impacted mandibular third molars were presented and one patient in the group without impacted mandibular third molars. The incidence of bad fracture in the exposed group was 3.7 times more than the unexposed group. The incidence of the bad fracture in exposed group was 3.7 times more than unexposed group. The chance of fractures in females was 1.7 times higher than males. With one year addition to the patient’s age, chance of fracture increased 0.985 times more.
CONCLUSION
Overall incidence of bad split fracture in presence of mandibular third molars in females and at older ages increased during BSSO. The extraction of impacted mandibular third molars, six months before the BSSO is recommended to prevent the bad split incidence during the operation.
Mozhgan Kazemian, Nafiseh Ghadiri Moghaddam , Najmeh Anbiaee, Hamed Kermani, Sahand Samiee Rad ,
Volume 11, Issue 2 (7-2022)
Abstract
Background
Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO) is one of the treatment options for Class III maxillary deficiency which may affect the condylar position and the patient's occlusion. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic changes of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) following mandibular set back surgery by BSSO.
Methods
In this retrospective study, All Class III patients, aged between 18-30 years old who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Ward of Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad, Iran from January 2018- January 2020 were enrolled. Radiographic changes of joint space, condylar position and clinical changes for maximal mouth opening and joint sound were examined before and 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed by SPSS16 software and the significance level of the data was set at P-value < 0.05.
Results
Twenty-five patients were recruited. The axial angle of the left and right condyle and condylar inclination on both sides reduced but this reduction was not statistically significant. While the anterior joint space was reduced and posterior joint space was increased in both sides, the changes on the right side were only significant (P = 0.039). In clinical examinations maximum mouth opening, lateral and protrusive movements were also decreased but this reduction was not statistically significant.
Conclusion
The mandibular set back with BSSO surgery in class III skeletal patients had no significant effect on the position of the condyle in the glenoid fossa as well as clinical symptoms.
Majid Eshghpour, Sahand Samieirad, Zahra Shooshtari, Abdolrahim Shams, Nafiseh Ghadirimoghaddam,
Volume 12, Issue 1 (2-2023)
Abstract
Background: The provision of sufficient stability after maxillofacial surgery is essential for the reduction of complications and disease recurrence. The stabilization of osteotomized pieces results in rapid restoration of normal masticatory function, reduction of skeletal relapse, and uneventful healing at the osteotomy site. We aimed to compare qualitatively stress distribution patterns over a virtual mandible model after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) bridged with three different intraoral fixation techniques.
Methods: This study was conducted in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Mashhad School of Dentistry, Mashhad, Iran, from March 2021-March 2022. The mandible computed tomography scan of a healthy adult was used to generate a 3D model; thereafter, BSSO with a 3mm setback was simulated. The three following fixation techniques were applied to the model: 1) two bicortical screws, 2) three bicortical screws, and 3) a miniplate. The bilateral second premolars and first molars were placed under mechanical loads of 75, 135, and 600N in order to simulate symmetric occlusal forces. Finite element analysis (FEA) was carried out in Ansys software, and the mechanical strain, stress, and displacement calculations were recorded.
Results: The FEA contours revealed that stress was mainly concentrated in the fixation units. Although bicortical screws presented better rigidity than miniplates, they were associated with higher stress and displacement readings.
Conclusion: Miniplate fixation demonstrated the most favorable biomechanical performance, followed by fixation with two and three bicortical screws, respectively. Intraoral fixation with miniplates in combination with monocortical screws can serve as an appropriate fixation arrangement and treatment option for skeletal stabilization after BSSO setback surgery.
