مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
جمعه 14 دی 1403
[Archive]
دوره 13، شماره 1 - ( 1402 )
جلد 13 شماره 1 صفحات 23-16 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mamizadeh M, Ghorabi S T, Jamali M, Shadfar F, Rouzbahani A K. Comparison the Effect of Fractional RF Laser with Microneedling on Facial Skin Rejuvenation, Open Pores and Skin Lightening: A Non-Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. WJPS 2024; 13 (1) :16-23
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1221-fa.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1221-fa.html
Comparison the Effect of Fractional RF Laser with Microneedling on Facial Skin Rejuvenation, Open Pores and Skin Lightening: A Non-Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک. 1402; 13 (1) :16-23
چکیده: (2309 مشاهده)
Abstract
Background: Effective skin rejuvenation treatments with RF technologies exist, with potential for personalized combination therapies based on individual factors. We compared microneedling and fractional RF laser effectiveness in rejuvenation, pore healing, and skin lightening.
Method: The research was a non-randomized clinical trial study conducted in 2021 at Ilam Skin Clinic, Ilam, western Iran on people applying for rejuvenation, skin lightening and improvement of open pores. People were voluntarily divided into two groups based on personal preferences (group A: microneedling, 25 people, group B: fractional RF, 25 people). After data collection, SPSS22 software was used for data analysis.
Results: The study revealed significant differences in the rates of low, moderate, and severe pain between the microneedling and fractional groups (10 vs. 16, 14 vs. 4, 1 vs. 5, respectively). Erythema showed no significant difference, with low, moderate, and severe cases reported in both groups. Swelling was lower in the microneedling group, but the difference was not significant. Bruising was similar in both groups, and staining was minimal. No herpes or infections were reported. The microneedling group showed better improvement in skin pores and skin lightening compared to the fractional group, with outcomes rated as good and excellent.
Conclusion: Microneedling surpassed the fractional group in skin rejuvenation, lightening, and improved pores. Considering RF lasers are approximately three times more expensive than microneedling, the research indicates that choosing microneedling is not only more cost-effective but also a superior rejuvenation technique.
Background: Effective skin rejuvenation treatments with RF technologies exist, with potential for personalized combination therapies based on individual factors. We compared microneedling and fractional RF laser effectiveness in rejuvenation, pore healing, and skin lightening.
Method: The research was a non-randomized clinical trial study conducted in 2021 at Ilam Skin Clinic, Ilam, western Iran on people applying for rejuvenation, skin lightening and improvement of open pores. People were voluntarily divided into two groups based on personal preferences (group A: microneedling, 25 people, group B: fractional RF, 25 people). After data collection, SPSS22 software was used for data analysis.
Results: The study revealed significant differences in the rates of low, moderate, and severe pain between the microneedling and fractional groups (10 vs. 16, 14 vs. 4, 1 vs. 5, respectively). Erythema showed no significant difference, with low, moderate, and severe cases reported in both groups. Swelling was lower in the microneedling group, but the difference was not significant. Bruising was similar in both groups, and staining was minimal. No herpes or infections were reported. The microneedling group showed better improvement in skin pores and skin lightening compared to the fractional group, with outcomes rated as good and excellent.
Conclusion: Microneedling surpassed the fractional group in skin rejuvenation, lightening, and improved pores. Considering RF lasers are approximately three times more expensive than microneedling, the research indicates that choosing microneedling is not only more cost-effective but also a superior rejuvenation technique.
فهرست منابع
1. Maranduca MA, Branisteanu D, Serban DN, et al. Synthesis and physiological implications of melanic pigments. Oncol Lett 2019;17(5):4183-7. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10071. [DOI:10.3892/ol.2019.10071]
2. Someya T, Amagai M. Toward a new generation of smart skins. Nat Biotechnol 2019;37(4):382-8. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0079-1. [DOI:10.1038/s41587-019-0079-1]
3. Yousef H, Alhajj M, Sharma S. Anatomy, Skin (Integument), Epidermis. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2023, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2023. PMID: 29262154.
4. Sachs DL, Varani J, Chubb H, et al. Atrophic and hypertrophic photoaging: clinical, histologic, and molecular features of 2 distinct phenotypes of photoaged skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019;81(2):480-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.03.081. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.03.081]
5. Shin J-W, Kwon S-H, Choi J-Y, et al. Molecular mechanisms of dermal aging and antiaging approaches. International journal of molecular sciences 2019;20(9):2126. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092126. [DOI:10.3390/ijms20092126]
6. Lyu J-J, Liu S-X. Radiofrequency in facial rejuvenation. International Journal of Dermatology and Venereology 2022;5(02):94-100. [DOI:10.1097/JD9.0000000000000193]
7. Cheng A-D, De La Garza H, Maymone MB, et al. Skin-Lightening Products: Consumer Preferences and Costs. Cureus 2021;13(8). doi: 10.7759/cureus.17245. [DOI:10.7759/cureus.17245]
8. Iftekhar N, Zhitny VP. Overview of skin bleaching history and origins. Dermatology 2021;237(2):306-8. doi: 10.1159/000509727. [DOI:10.1159/000509727]
9. Vijaya RM. Dangerous skin bleaching has become a public health crisis. Corporate marketing lies behind it. The Washington Post 2019.
10. Tanha A, Rabiee M, Rostami A, Ahmadi S. A green-based approach for noninvasive skin rejuvenation: Potential application of hyaluronic acid. Environ Res 2023:116467. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116467. [DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2023.116467]
11. Zhang S, Duan E. Fighting against skin aging: the way from bench to bedside. Cell Transplant 2018;27(5):729-38. doi: 10.1177/0963689717725755. [DOI:10.1177/0963689717725755]
12. Yoon JH, Kim J, Lee H, et al. Laminin peptide YIGSR induces collagen synthesis in Hs27 human dermal fibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012;428(3):416-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.10.070. [DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.10.070]
13. Chen C-L, Liou S-F, Chen S-J, Shih M-F. Protective effects of Chlorella-derived peptide on UVB-induced production of MMP-1 and degradation of procollagen genes in human skin fibroblasts. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2011;60(1):112-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.03.001. [DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.03.001]
14. Kim MS, Oh GH, Kim MJ, Hwang JK. Fucosterol inhibits matrix metalloproteinase expression and promotes type‐1 procollagen production in UVB‐induced HaCaT cells. Photochem Photobiol 2013;89(4):911-8. doi: 10.1111/php.12061. [DOI:10.1111/php.12061]
15. Banihashemi M, Nakhaeizadeh S. An introduction to application of platelet rich plasma (PRP) in skin rejuvenation. Reviews in Clinical Medicine 2014;1(2):38-43.doi: 10.17463/RCM.2014.01.001.
16. Iriarte C, Awosika O, Rengifo-Pardo M, Ehrlich A. Review of applications of microneedling in dermatology. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2017:289-98. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S142450. [DOI:10.2147/CCID.S142450]
17. Mamizadeh M, Jowzi M, Tahmasebi Ghorabi S, Hosseini SH, Khorshidi A, Karimi Rouzbahani A. Comparing of the effectiveness and patients satisfaction in employing two approaches of Subcision and microneedling with Subcision and laser CO2 fractional in the treatment of acne scar. Journal of Pakistan Association of Dermatologists 2023;33(2):499-506.
18. McCrudden MT, McAlister E, Courtenay AJ, González‐Vázquez P, Raj Singh TR, Donnelly RF. Microneedle applications in improving skin appearance. Exp Dermatol 2015;24(8):561-6. doi: 10.1111/exd.12723. [DOI:10.1111/exd.12723]
19. Draelos ZD. Cosmetic dermatology: products and procedures: John Wiley & Sons; 2022. [DOI:10.1002/9781119676881]
20. Wong QYA, Chew FT. Defining skin aging and its risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2021;11(1):22075. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01573-z. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-01573-z]
21. Chun S. Fractional microneedling radiofrequency and fractional 1927 nm thulium laser treatment offer synergistic skin rejuvenation: a pilot case series. Laser Therapy 2018;27(4):283-91. doi: 10.5978/islsm.27_18-OR-26. [DOI:10.5978/islsm.27_18-OR-26]
22. Nilforoushzadeh MA, Alavi S, Heidari‐Kharaji M, et al. Biometric changes of skin parameters in using of microneedling fractional radiofrequency for skin tightening and rejuvenation facial. Skin Research and Technology 2020;26(6):859-66. doi: 10.1111/srt.12887. [DOI:10.1111/srt.12887]
23. Khanali S, Pedram A, Poorolajal J. Comparison of the efficacy of fractional CO2 laser with microneedling in management of patients with atrophic acne scars: a single-blind clinical trial. Dermatology and Cosmetic 2021;11(4):282-91. URL: http://jdc.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5494-en.html
24. Robati RM, Hamedani B, Namazi N, Niknejad N, Gheisari M. Efficacy of microneedling versus fractional Er: YAG laser in facial rejuvenation. J Cosmet Dermatol 2020;19(6):1333-40. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13440. [DOI:10.1111/jocd.13440]
25. Serdar ZA, Tatlıparmak A. Comparison of efficacy and safety of fractional radiofrequency and fractional Er: YAG laser in facial and neck wrinkles: Six‐year experience with 333 patients. Dermatol Ther 2019;32(5):e13054. doi: 10.1111/dth.13054. [DOI:10.1111/dth.13054]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
