مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
جمعه 14 دی 1403
[Archive]
دوره 13، شماره 2 - ( 1403 )
جلد 13 شماره 2 صفحات 43-39 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Motazedian G, Yazdanphanahi P, Jabbarinia E, Kaviani A, Salari F, Atighi F, et al . Radix's Importance for Plastic Surgeons: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. WJPS 2024; 13 (2) :39-43
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1292-fa.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1292-fa.html
Radix's Importance for Plastic Surgeons: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک. 1403; 13 (2) :39-43
چکیده: (1363 مشاهده)
Background: Considering the importance of the nose in the beauty of the face, accurate and systematic three-dimensional nasal analysis of the nose before the procedure is essential. The radix, and so the nasofrontal and nasofacial angles, play an essential role in forming an aesthetically pleasing nose because they influence the length and projection of the nose. We aimed to measure information about the pre-operative radix position in our region.
Method: Pre-operative images were taken from our cases in the profile view. A checklist including radix location and projection, nasofrontal angle, and nasofacial angle were extracted from these images.
Results: Overall, 200 (100 males and 100 females) cases were enrolled. Thirty-two male cases and 48 females had abnormal radix position. Radix projection were normal in only 36 male cases and 18 females. The mean nasofrontal angle in the male and female groups was 119.2 and 128.2 respectively. The mean nasofacial angle was 29.8 in the female groups and 32.6 in the male group.
Conclusion: The reality of the current society of Iranian patients can be very different from the predictions of surgeons and can be far away from the statistics mentioned in western books. We tried to notify surgeons to thoroughly examine the patients prior to surgical operation by measuring parameters such as projection and position of the radix and nasofrontal and nasofacial angles.
Method: Pre-operative images were taken from our cases in the profile view. A checklist including radix location and projection, nasofrontal angle, and nasofacial angle were extracted from these images.
Results: Overall, 200 (100 males and 100 females) cases were enrolled. Thirty-two male cases and 48 females had abnormal radix position. Radix projection were normal in only 36 male cases and 18 females. The mean nasofrontal angle in the male and female groups was 119.2 and 128.2 respectively. The mean nasofacial angle was 29.8 in the female groups and 32.6 in the male group.
Conclusion: The reality of the current society of Iranian patients can be very different from the predictions of surgeons and can be far away from the statistics mentioned in western books. We tried to notify surgeons to thoroughly examine the patients prior to surgical operation by measuring parameters such as projection and position of the radix and nasofrontal and nasofacial angles.
فهرست منابع
1. Devgan L, Singh P, Durairaj K. Surgical Cosmetic Procedures of the Face. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2019 Jun;52(3):425-41. [DOI:10.1016/j.otc.2019.02.001]
2. Fischer H, Gubisch W. Nasal reconstruction: a challenge for plastic surgery. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008 Oct;105(43):741-6. [DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2008.0741]
3. Rohrich RJ, Ahmad J. Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011 Aug;128(2):49e-73e. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821e7191]
4. Singh A, Maniskas SA, Bruckman KC, Steinbacher DM. Rhinoplasty Using Three-Dimensional Analysis and Simulation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020 Apr;145(4):944-6. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006687]
5. Khansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD. Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media Analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2016 Jan;36(1):NP1-5. [DOI:10.1093/asj/sjv095]
6. Domanski MC, Cavale N. Self-reported "worth it" rating of aesthetic surgery in social media. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012 Dec;36(6):1292-5. [DOI:10.1007/s00266-012-9977-z]
7. Chauhan N, Alexander AJ, Sepehr A, Adamson PA. Patient complaints with primary versus revision rhinoplasty: analysis and practice implications. Aesthet Surg J 2011 Sep;31(7):775-80. [DOI:10.1177/1090820X11417427]
8. Meningaud JP, Lantieri L, Bertrand JC. Rhinoplasty: an outcome research. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008 Jan;121(1):251-7. [DOI:10.1097/01.prs.0000293866.57517.d4]
9. Brito IM, Avashia Y, Rohrich RJ. Evidence-based Nasal Analysis for Rhinoplasty: The 10-7-5 Method. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020 Feb;8(2):e2632. [DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002632]
10. Rollin K. Daniel M. Rhinoplasty: An Atlas of Surgical Techniques. 1st ed. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2002.
11. Rohrich RJ, Muzaffar AR, Janis JE. Component Dorsal Hump Reduction: The Importance of Maintaining Dorsal Aesthetic Lines in Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004 Oct;114(5):1298-308. [DOI:10.1097/01.PRS.0000135861.45986.CF]
12. Wang JH, Jang YJ, Park S-K, Lee B-J. Measurement of aesthetic proportions in the profile view of Koreans. Ann Plast Surg 2009;62(2):109-13. [DOI:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31817e2c87]
13. Mowlavi A, Meldrum DG, Wilhelmi BJ. Implications for nasal recontouring: nasion position preferences as determined by a survey of white North Americans. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2003;27:438-45. [DOI:10.1007/s00266-004-3083-9]
14. Wang D, Xiong S, Wu Y, Zeng N. Aging of the Nose: A Quantitative Analysis of Nasal Soft Tissue and Bone on Computed Tomography. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022 Nov 1;150(5):993e-1000e. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000009620]
15. Eliakim-Ikechukwu C, Ekpo A, Etika M, Ihentuge C, Mesembe O. Facial aesthetic angles of the Ibo and Yoruba ethnic groups of Nigeria. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci 2013;5(5):14-7. [DOI:10.9790/3008-0551417]
16. Choe KS, Sclafani AP, Litner JA, Yu G-P, Romo III T. The Korean American woman's face. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004; 6(4):244-52. [DOI:10.1001/archfaci.6.4.244]
17. Uzun A, Ozdemir F. Morphometric analysis of nasal shapes and angles in young adults. Br J Otorhinolaryngol 2014;80:397-402. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.010]
18. Tuan HNA, Hai NDX, Thinh NT. Shape Prediction of Nasal Bones by Digital 2D-Photogrammetry of the Nose Based on Convolution and Back-Propagation Neural Network. Comput Math Methods Med 2022;2022:5938493. [DOI:10.1155/2022/5938493]
19. Packiriswamy V, Bashour M, Nayak S. Anthropometric analysis of the South Indian woman's nose. Facial Plastic Surgery 2016;32(03):304-8. [DOI:10.1055/s-0036-1581140]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
