مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
سه شنبه 19 خرداد 1405
[Archive]
دوره 15، شماره 1 - ( 1405 )
جلد 15 شماره 1 صفحات 30-23 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Haddady- Abianeh S, Rahmati J, Yavari A, Delavari C, Arani M T, Molaei H. Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for Endoscopic Brow Lift: Bone Tunnel Fixation Versus Temporary Tape Fixation: A Clinical Trial. WJPS 2026; 15 (1) :23-30
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1613-fa.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1613-fa.html
Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for Endoscopic Brow Lift: Bone Tunnel Fixation Versus Temporary Tape Fixation: A Clinical Trial. مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک. 1405; 15 (1) :23-30
چکیده: (131 مشاهده)
Background: We compared two endoscopic brow lift fixation techniques in a 2023 randomized clinical trial: bone tunnel fixation versus temporary tape fixation. The primary objective was to evaluate the stability of the brow lift over time.
Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to either the bone tunnel group or the tape fixation group, where a mesh tape was secured to the scalp and removed 7-10 days post-surgery. In total, 36 individuals participated in the study, including 18 patients in the Taping group and 18 patients in the Bony Fixation group. Pre-operative eyebrow measurements were taken, and patients were followed up at one and nine months to assess outcomes
Results: While the bone tunnel technique required a significantly longer surgical time, it was more effective at maintaining the brow lift in both the medial and lateral regions of the eyebrow after nine months. Complication rates were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: Bone tunnel fixation provides superior long-term stability for endoscopic brow lift compared to temporary tape fixation, despite the longer procedure duration. Further research with extended follow-up is recommended to confirm long-term outcomes.
Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to either the bone tunnel group or the tape fixation group, where a mesh tape was secured to the scalp and removed 7-10 days post-surgery. In total, 36 individuals participated in the study, including 18 patients in the Taping group and 18 patients in the Bony Fixation group. Pre-operative eyebrow measurements were taken, and patients were followed up at one and nine months to assess outcomes
Results: While the bone tunnel technique required a significantly longer surgical time, it was more effective at maintaining the brow lift in both the medial and lateral regions of the eyebrow after nine months. Complication rates were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: Bone tunnel fixation provides superior long-term stability for endoscopic brow lift compared to temporary tape fixation, despite the longer procedure duration. Further research with extended follow-up is recommended to confirm long-term outcomes.
فهرست منابع
1. Cho MJ, Carboy JA, Rohrich RJ. Complications in Brow Lifts: A Systemic Review of Surgical and Nonsurgical Brow Rejuvenations. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018 Oct;6(10):e1943. [DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001943]
2. Raggio BS, Winters R. Endoscopic Brow Lift. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2025.
3. Nassif PS, Kokoska MS, Homan S, Cooper MH, Thomas JR. Comparison of Subperiosteal vs Subgaleal Elevation Techniques Used in Forehead Lifts. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery 1998;124(11):1209-15. [DOI:10.1001/archotol.124.11.1209]
4. Nassif PS, Kokoska MS, Homan S, Cooper MH, Thomas JR. Comparison of subperiosteal vs subgaleal elevation techniques used in forehead lifts. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998 Nov;124(11):1209-15. [DOI:10.1001/archotol.124.11.1209]
5. Pascali M, Bocchini I, Avantaggiato A, Cervelli V. 2014 SICPRE Proceedings: Meeting Proceedings. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015 Mar;3(3). [DOI:10.1097/01.GOX.0000464831.37068.f0]
6. Karimi N, Kashkouli MB, Sianati H, Khademi B. Techniques of Eyebrow Lifting: A Narrative Review. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2020 Apr-Jun;15(2):218-35. [DOI:10.18502/jovr.v15i2.6740]
7. Troilius C. Subperiosteal brow lifts without fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004 Nov;114(6):1595-603; discussion 604-5. [DOI:10.1097/01.PRS.0000138758.48043.44]
8. Foustanos A. Suture fixation technique for endoscopic brow lift. Semin Plast Surg 2008 Feb;22(1):43-9. [DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1019142]
9. Pascali M, Avantaggiato A, Bocchini I, Carinci F, Cervelli V. Comparison among three different fixation techniques in temporal brow lift surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2015 May;26(3):906-10. [DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000001603]
10. Puig CM, LaFerriere KA. A retrospective comparison of open and endoscopic brow-lifts. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2002 Oct-Dec;4(4):221-5. [DOI:10.1001/archfaci.4.4.221]
11. Caceres H, Raza SN, Katta T, et al. Fixation Techniques Across Endoscopic Brow Lifts: A Scoping Review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2025 Aug 13. [DOI:10.1007/s00266-025-05114-1]
12. Chasan PE, Hauch AT. The K-Wire Fixation Technique for Endoscopic Brow Lift: A Long-Term Follow-Up. Aesthet Surg J 2020 Sep 14;40(10):1051-60. [DOI:10.1093/asj/sjz215]
13. Jones BM, Grover R. Endoscopic brow lift: a personal review of 538 patients and comparison of fixation techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004 Apr 1;113(4):1242-50; discussion 51-2. [DOI:10.1097/01.PRS.0000110206.25586.78]
14. Şibar S, Dikmen AU, Erdal AI. Long-term Stability in Endoscopic Brow Lift: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Aesthet Surg J 2025 Feb 18;45(3):232-40. [DOI:10.1093/asj/sjae225]
15. Raggio BS, Winters R. Endoscopic brow lift. 2019.
16. Hönig JF, Frank MH, Knutti D, de La Fuente A. Video endoscopic-assisted brow lift: comparison of the eyebrow position after Endotine tissue fixation versus suture fixation. J Craniofac Surg 2008 Jul;19(4):1140-7. [DOI:10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181764b19]
17. Liu RH, Kim M, Lindsay RW. Short-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Brow Lifting Without Depressor Resection. Laryngoscope 2025 Aug 18. [DOI:10.1002/lary.70059]
18. Chowdhury S, Malhotra R, Smith R, Arnstein P. Patient and surgeon experience with the endotine forehead device for brow and forehead lift. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2007 Sep-Oct;23(5):358-62. [DOI:10.1097/IOP.0b013e318142c8cd]
19. Wang T, Li Y, Pang M. Evaluation of morphological and psychological outcomes after sub-brow blepharoplasty. Front Surg 2025;12:1658806. [DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1658806]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
