مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
دوشنبه 27 مهر 1405
[Archive]
دوره 15، شماره 2 - ( 1405 )
جلد 15 شماره 2 صفحات 107-105 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Madadizadeh F, Afzal G. The Evolving Landscape of Burn Severity Assessment: From the Rule of Nines to the Burn-Specific Frailty Index. WJPS 2026; 15 (2) :105-107
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1663-fa.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1663-fa.html
The Evolving Landscape of Burn Severity Assessment: From the Rule of Nines to the Burn-Specific Frailty Index. مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک. 1405; 15 (2) :105-107
چکیده: (640 مشاهده)
Assessing and predicting outcomes for burn patients remains a major challenge in emergency and critical care. Quickly and accurately estimating the burn's seriousness, the needed fluids, and the risk of death is key to starting the right treatment, using resources well, and talking clearly with families. Over time, many scoring tools have been created to help with this and improve predictions . This letter explains the development and use of the main tools, focusing on how they help in care.
فهرست منابع
1. 1 Zieliński M, Wróblewski P, Kozielski J. Prognostic factors in patients with burns. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2020;52(4):330-5. [DOI:10.5114/ait.2020.97497]
2. 2 García-Ballesteros DI, Rivera-Martínez DDC, García-Pérez MM, Valdés-Flores E, Castro-Govea Y, Chacón-Moreno HJ. Evaluation and optimization of the Wallace Rule of Nines for the estimation of total body surface area in obese and nonobese populations. J Emerg Med 2023;65(4):e320-e7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.05.017]
3. 3 Daniels M, Fuchs PC, Lefering R, et al. Is the Parkland formula still the best method for determining the fluid resuscitation volume in adults for the first 24 hours after injury? - A retrospective analysis of burn patients in Germany. Burns 2021 2021/06/01/;47(4):914-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.001]
4. 4 Christofides C, Moore R, Nel M. Baux Score as a Predictor of Mortality at the CHBAH Adult Burns Unit. J Surg Res 2020 2020/07/01/;251:53-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2020.01.018]
5. 5 Kim Y, Kym D, Hur J, et al. Does inhalation injury predict mortality in burns patients or require redefinition? PLoS One 2017;12(9):e0185195. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0185195]
6. 6 Edgar MC, Bond SM, Jiang SH, Scharf IM, Bejarano G, Vrouwe SQ. The Revised Baux Score as a Predictor of Burn Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Burn Care Res 2023 Nov 2;44(6):1278-88. [DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irad075]
7. 7 Deng G, Tang L, Yang Q, Li Z. Association of the abbreviated burn severity index with mortality in severely burned patients: A meta-analysis. PloS One 2025;20(2):e0319199. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0319199]
8. 8 Obed D, Salim M, Dastagir N, et al. Comparative analysis of composite mortality prediction scores in intensive care burn patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19(19):12321. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph191912321]
9. 9 Tagami T, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Validation of the prognostic burn index: a nationwide retrospective study. Burns 2015 Sep;41(6):1169-75. [DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2015.02.017]
10. 10 Shafiee A, Arabzadeh Bahri R, Rajai S, Ahoopai M, Seighali N, Amini MJ. Frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes in burn patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2023 Oct 19;23(1):680. [DOI:10.1186/s12877-023-04302-5]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
