مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
شنبه 14 شهریور 1405
[Archive]
چکیده: (11 مشاهده)
Background: In recent years, the prevalence of various rhinoplasty procedures has increased. Alar base reduction (ABR) techniques are utilized in approximately 15–20% of these patients. Major studies indicate that under correction of alar base is a primary cause of patient dissatisfaction and suboptimal outcomes. We aimed to compare conventional bilateral ABR with a modified technique involving bilateral facial repositioning (bilateral facial medial advancement) using a mattress suture (BFR-mattress).
Methods: Forty-two septorhinoplasty candidates requiring ABR were enrolled into two groups: a control group (conventional bilateral ABR) and an intervention group (ABR with BFR-mattress). Standardized photographic documentation was obtained preoperatively and at the 6-month follow-up. Outcomes were assessed based on patient-reported satisfaction and evaluations by blinded independent surgeon.
Results: No significant differences were found between the groups in demographic parameters (age, sex distribution; P > 0.05). Preoperative interalar-to-intercanthal ratios were comparable between the groups (Control: 1.21 ± 0.12, Intervention: 1.20 ± 0.06; P= 0.885). At 6 months, the intervention group exhibited significantly lower ratios (1.13 ± 0.09 [in control group] vs. 1.04 ± 0.07 [in intervention group]; P = 0.003), indicating more narrowing of the alar base. Notably, despite achieving greater alar base reduction, the BFR-mattress technique resulted in comparable outcomes in nasal obstruction, symmetry and scar appearance.
Conclusion: The BFR-mattress suture technique provides significantly greater alar base width reduction compared to conventional ABR, without increasing complication rates.
Methods: Forty-two septorhinoplasty candidates requiring ABR were enrolled into two groups: a control group (conventional bilateral ABR) and an intervention group (ABR with BFR-mattress). Standardized photographic documentation was obtained preoperatively and at the 6-month follow-up. Outcomes were assessed based on patient-reported satisfaction and evaluations by blinded independent surgeon.
Results: No significant differences were found between the groups in demographic parameters (age, sex distribution; P > 0.05). Preoperative interalar-to-intercanthal ratios were comparable between the groups (Control: 1.21 ± 0.12, Intervention: 1.20 ± 0.06; P= 0.885). At 6 months, the intervention group exhibited significantly lower ratios (1.13 ± 0.09 [in control group] vs. 1.04 ± 0.07 [in intervention group]; P = 0.003), indicating more narrowing of the alar base. Notably, despite achieving greater alar base reduction, the BFR-mattress technique resulted in comparable outcomes in nasal obstruction, symmetry and scar appearance.
Conclusion: The BFR-mattress suture technique provides significantly greater alar base width reduction compared to conventional ABR, without increasing complication rates.
نوع مطالعه: مقالات اصيل |
موضوع مقاله:
تخصصي
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
