دوره 11، شماره 3 - ( 1401 )                   جلد 11 شماره 3 صفحات 62-55 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Namazi P, Fatemi M J, pahlevanpour P, Abbastabar H, Naderi Gharahgheshlagh S. Comparative Effects of Recove® and Nitrofurazone 0.2% on the Treatment of First and Second-Degree Burns: a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. WJPS 2022; 11 (3) :55-62
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-989-fa.html
Comparative Effects of Recove® and Nitrofurazone 0.2% on the Treatment of First and Second-Degree Burns: a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک. 1401; 11 (3) :55-62

URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-989-fa.html


چکیده:   (901 مشاهده)
Background: Burns are among the major health challenges of all societies and more than any other trauma incur physical, mental, social, and economic burdens on the patient and society. This study was conducted to assess whether Recove® burn ointment is capable of alleviating the pain, preventing the formation of new blisters and controlling the microbial contamination of the wound.
Methods: We, therefore, compared its efficacy to ​​nitrofurazone 0.2% cream. This randomized clinical trial was conducted on individuals who had two burn injuries in their body at the same time in the Motahari Burn Hospital, Tehran Province, from June to October 2016. Sampling was carried out with a non-random method using available samples. The intervention in experimental and control groups was Recove® and nitrofurazone, respectively. The effect of interventions on pain relief, the formation of new blisters and prevention of infection at the burn wound were evaluated. In our double-blind study, blindness was applied to the patients and the person evaluating the outcomes.
Results: Both Recove® and nitrofurazone interventions significantly alleviated pain (P < 0.01), but Recove ®showed more effectiveness (P=0.01)Similarly, in terms of new blister formation, the experimental group receiving Recove® showed less new blister formation over 24 hours after treatment compared to nitrofurazone group (P=0.03) and with respect to antimicrobial activity, there was no significant difference between Recove® and nitrofurazone (P=0.12).  
Conclusion: Recove® was effective on pain reduction, prevention of new blisters formation as well as infection. Therefore, it seems that Recove® could be considered as a new and efficient treatment for burn.
 
     
نوع مطالعه: مقالات اصيل | موضوع مقاله: تخصصي
انتشار الکترونیک: 1401/9/21

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | World Journal of Plastic Surgery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb