WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
Sat, Apr 26, 2025
[Archive]
Volume 13, Issue 3 (2024)
WJPS 2024, 13(3): 49-56 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jabbari N, Shooshtari Z, Mohammadi S, Ghazi N, Kazemian M. Does Collagen Membrane Coverage Offer any Advantage for Lateral Window Sinus Augmentation? A Histologic and Histomorphometric Analysis. WJPS 2024; 13 (3) :49-56
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1323-en.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1323-en.html
1- Student Research Committee, Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2- Dental Research Center, Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Cellular Biology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4- Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Department, Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center, Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
5- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center Student Research Committee Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran ,: kazemianmz@mums.ac.ir
2- Dental Research Center, Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Cellular Biology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4- Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Department, Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center, Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
5- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center Student Research Committee Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran ,
Abstract: (2036 Views)
Background: We aimed to determine whether collagen membrane coverage in maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery, provides an advantage regarding bone regeneration.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial included all healthy adults presented for dental implant placement in the posterior edentulous maxilla at the Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad, Iran from 2021-2022. Participants were candidates for sinus floor elevation surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to control (with membrane) and test (without membrane) groups. Surgery was performed through the lateral window technique and using allograft particles. According to the assigned study group; either a collagen membrane was placed over the osteotomy window or it was left uncovered. Six months after surgery when patients were recalled for implant placement, a bone specimen was obtained and sent for histologic and histomorphometric analysis. The predictor variable was the use of collagenous membrane and the outcome variables were the amount of newly formed bone, native bone, and connective tissue.
Results: A total of 30 consecutive patients, with a mean age of 46.33±7.25 years completed the study. Histomorphometric measurements, six months after augmentation revealed that the mean area of connective tissue was significantly less in the group with membrane coverage (P=0.015). The area of newly formed bone was significantly greater in sites covered with a collagen membrane compared to grafted but uncovered sites; (P <0.001).
Conclusion: Covering the lateral osteotomy window with a bioabsorbable collagenous membrane is able to significantly enhance vital bone formation and decrease connective tissue proliferation.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial included all healthy adults presented for dental implant placement in the posterior edentulous maxilla at the Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad, Iran from 2021-2022. Participants were candidates for sinus floor elevation surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to control (with membrane) and test (without membrane) groups. Surgery was performed through the lateral window technique and using allograft particles. According to the assigned study group; either a collagen membrane was placed over the osteotomy window or it was left uncovered. Six months after surgery when patients were recalled for implant placement, a bone specimen was obtained and sent for histologic and histomorphometric analysis. The predictor variable was the use of collagenous membrane and the outcome variables were the amount of newly formed bone, native bone, and connective tissue.
Results: A total of 30 consecutive patients, with a mean age of 46.33±7.25 years completed the study. Histomorphometric measurements, six months after augmentation revealed that the mean area of connective tissue was significantly less in the group with membrane coverage (P=0.015). The area of newly formed bone was significantly greater in sites covered with a collagen membrane compared to grafted but uncovered sites; (P <0.001).
Conclusion: Covering the lateral osteotomy window with a bioabsorbable collagenous membrane is able to significantly enhance vital bone formation and decrease connective tissue proliferation.
References
1. Sorní M, Guarinós J, García O, Peñarrocha M. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic upper jaw: a review of the literature since 1999. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2005 Apr 1;10 Suppl 1:E45-56.
2. Kolerman R, Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Barnea E, Tal H. Histomorphometric analysis of newly formed bone after bilateral maxillary sinus augmentation using two different osteoconductive materials and internal collagen membrane. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012 Feb;32(1):e21-8.
3. Del Fabbro M, Rosano G, Taschieri S. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation. Eur J Oral Sci 2008 Dec;116(6):497-506. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00571.x]
4. Taschieri S, Corbella S, Del Fabbro M. Mini-invasive osteotome sinus floor elevation in partially edentulous atrophic maxilla using reduced length dental implants: interim results of a prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014 Apr;16(2):185-93. [DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00483.x]
5. Danesh-Sani SA, Loomer PM, Wallace SS. A comprehensive clinical review of maxillary sinus floor elevation: anatomy, techniques, biomaterials and complications. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016 Sep;54(7):724-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.05.008]
6. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980 Aug;38(8):613-6.
7. Tatum O. Maxillary sinus grafting for endosseous implants. Presentedat the Annual Meeting of Alabama Implant Study Groupe, Birmingham, AL, 1977; 1977; 1977.
8. Stern A, Green J. Sinus lift procedures: an overview of current techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2012 Jan;56(1):219-33, x. [DOI:10.1016/j.cden.2011.09.003]
9. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003 Dec;8(1):328-43. [DOI:10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328]
10. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):216-40. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x]
11. Barone A, Santini S, Sbordone L, Crespi R, Covani U. A clinical study of the outcomes and complications associated with maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):81-5.
12. Marchionni F, Alfonsi F, Santini S, Marconcini S, Covani U, Barone A. Maxillary sinus augmentation: collagen membrane over the osteotomy window. A pilot study. Journal of Osseointegration 2015;7(1):15-20.
13. Soardi CM, Spinato S, Zaffe D, Wang HL. Atrophic maxillary floor augmentation by mineralized human bone allograft in sinuses of different size: an histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011 May;22(5):560-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02034.x]
14. Lombardi T, Stacchi C, Berton F, Traini T, Torelli L, Di Lenarda R. Influence of Maxillary Sinus Width on New Bone Formation After Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation: A Proof-of-Concept Prospective Cohort Study. Implant Dent 2017 Apr;26(2):209-16. [DOI:10.1097/ID.0000000000000554]
15. Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Ottonelli R, Berton F, Perinetti G, Traini T. New bone formation after transcrestal sinus floor elevation was influenced by sinus cavity dimensions: A prospective histologic and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018 May;29(5):465-79. [DOI:10.1111/clr.13144]
16. Bernardello F, Righi D, Cosci F, Bozzoli P, Soardi CM, Spinato S. Crestal sinus lift with sequential drills and simultaneous implant placement in sites with <5 mm of native bone: a multicenter retrospective study. Implant Dent 2011 Dec;20(6):439-44. [DOI:10.1097/ID.0b013e3182342052]
17. Trombelli L, Franceschetti G, Trisi P, Farina R. Incremental, transcrestal sinus floor elevation with a minimally invasive technique in the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy. Clinical and histological findings from a proof-of-concept case series. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015 May;73(5):861-88. [DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2014.12.009]
18. Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Rohrer MD, Cho SC. Histologic and clinical comparison of bilateral sinus floor elevations with and without barrier membrane placement in 12 patients: Part 3 of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000 Apr;20(2):117-25.
19. Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Cho SC, et al. Sinus augmentation utilizing anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) with absorbable and nonabsorbable membranes placed over the lateral window: histomorphometric and clinical analyses. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005 Dec;25(6):551-9.
20. Schulten EA, Prins HJ, Overman JR, Helder MN, ten Bruggenkate CM, Klein-Nulend J. A novel approach revealing the effect of a collagenous membrane on osteoconduction in maxillary sinus floor elevation with β-tricalcium phosphate. Eur Cell Mater 2013 Mar 25;25:215-28. [DOI:10.22203/eCM.v025a16]
21. Choi KS, Kan JY, Boyne PJ, Goodacre CJ, Lozada JL, Rungcharassaeng K. The effects of resorbable membrane on human maxillary sinus graft: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):73-80.
22. Barone A, Ricci M, Grassi RF, Nannmark U, Quaranta A, Covani U. A 6-month histological analysis on maxillary sinus augmentation with and without use of collagen membranes over the osteotomy window: randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013 Jan;24(1):1-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02340.x]
23. Starch-Jensen T, Deluiz D, Duch K, Tinoco EMB. Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With or Without Barrier Membrane Coverage of the Lateral Window: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2019 Oct-Dec;10(4):e1. [DOI:10.5037/jomr.2019.10401]
24. Shiezadeh F, Taher M, Shooshtari Z, Arab H, Shafieian R. Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Combination With Allograft Bone Particles Can Induce Bone Formation in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023 Jul;81(7):904-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2023.03.015]
25. Tawil G, Mawla M. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001 Sep-Oct;16(5):713-21.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
