WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
Tue, Apr 29, 2025
[Archive]
Volume 14, Issue 1 (2025)
WJPS 2025, 14(1): 28-32 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Vaghardoost R, Latifi N A, Abbaszadeh A, Roustaei S, Tavakoli M. Evaluating the Feasibility of Clinical Studies on Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Based On the Hospital Records. WJPS 2025; 14 (1) :28-32
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1389-en.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1389-en.html
Reza Vaghardoost1 
, Noor ahmad Latifi1 , Abolfazl Abbaszadeh1 , Shahram Roustaei *2 , Mahdiye Tavakoli3
, Noor ahmad Latifi1 , Abolfazl Abbaszadeh1 , Shahram Roustaei *2 , Mahdiye Tavakoli3
1- 1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of medicine, Iran university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- 1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of medicine, Iran university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran ,Dr.shahram.roustaei@gmail.com
3- PhD in Speech therapy, Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- 1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of medicine, Iran university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran ,
3- PhD in Speech therapy, Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (297 Views)
Background: Policy makers, researchers and health care professionals are faced daily with the challenge of how to prioritize their activities and actions in different areas of their responsibilities. In the field of health, their decisions are often influenced by the reality of population needs on the one hand and limited resources on the other. The correctness of decisions is completely dependent on the quality and accuracy of information from the target population. Patient registries, have for decades been an important source of data needed to evaluate clinical practice, evaluate health service delivery, and assess policy implications at the local, regional, national, and international levels.
Method: Based on the research objectives, fourteen registration forms consisting of 790 variables were designed. The data of cleft lip and palate patients who underwent surgery in Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital during the year 2022, in Tehran, Iran, were collected and entered into the registration system, and then the amount of recorded data was assessed based on the research objectives.
Results: Only 28% of the data of cleft lip and palate patients were recorded in the clinical files during their hospital stay, and 72% of the required data are not recorded. However, the accuracy of the recorded data and their validity has not been evaluated.
Conclusion: In order to obtain the necessary data for the designed objectives, the data recorded in the hospital are not sufficient and accurate, and a registry is needed to record accurately the data of cleft lip and palate patients.
Method: Based on the research objectives, fourteen registration forms consisting of 790 variables were designed. The data of cleft lip and palate patients who underwent surgery in Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital during the year 2022, in Tehran, Iran, were collected and entered into the registration system, and then the amount of recorded data was assessed based on the research objectives.
Results: Only 28% of the data of cleft lip and palate patients were recorded in the clinical files during their hospital stay, and 72% of the required data are not recorded. However, the accuracy of the recorded data and their validity has not been evaluated.
Conclusion: In order to obtain the necessary data for the designed objectives, the data recorded in the hospital are not sufficient and accurate, and a registry is needed to record accurately the data of cleft lip and palate patients.
References
1. Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG, Dixon MJ, Shaw WC. Cleft lip and palate. Lancet 2009;374:1773e85. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4]
2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4]
3. Dixon MJ, Marazita ML, Beaty TH, Murray JC. Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:167e78. [DOI:10.1038/nrg2933]
4. doi: 10.1038/nrg2933. [DOI:10.1038/nrg2933]
5. Kara M, Calis M, Kara I, Kulak Kayikci ME, Gunaydin RO, Ozgur F. Comparison of speech outcomes using type 2b intravelar veloplasty or furlow doubleopposing Z plasty for soft palate repair of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2021 Mar;49(3):215-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2021.01.003]
6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.01.003. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2021.01.003]
7. Sandy J, Davies A, Humphries K, Ireland T, Wren Y. Cleft lip and palate: Care configuration, national
8. registration, and research strategies. J World Fed Orthod. 2020;9(3,Supplement):S40-S4. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.09.003]
9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.09.003. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.09.003]
10. Hagberg C, Larson O, Milerad J. Incidence of cleft lip and palate and risks of additional malformations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:40-5.
https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1998)035<0040:IOCLAP>2.3.CO;2 [DOI:10.1597/1545-1569(1998)0352.3.CO;2]
11. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1998_035_0040_ioclap_2.3.co_2. [DOI:10.1597/1545-1569_1998_035_0040_ioclap_2.3.co_2]
12. Lazem M, Sheikhtaheri A. Barriers and facilitators for disease registry systems: a mixed-method study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022;22(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12911-022-01840-7]
13. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01840-7. [DOI:10.1186/s12911-022-01840-7]
14. Queiroz Herkrath AP, Herkrath FJ, Rebelo MA, Vettore MV. Measurement of health-related and oral health-related quality of life among individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2015;52:157e72. [DOI:10.1597/13-104]
15. doi: 10.1597/13-104. [DOI:10.1597/13-104]
16. Calzolari E, Bianchi F, Rubini M, Ritvanen A, Neville AJ; EUROCAT Working Group. Epidemiology of cleft palate in Europe: implications for genetic research. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41(3):244-249. [DOI:10.1597/02-074.1]
17. doi:10.1597/02- 074.1.
18. Clementi M, Tenconi R, Bianchi F, Stoll C, EUROSCAN Study Group. Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate and cleft palate by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries. Prenatal diagnosis 2000;20(11):870-5.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0223(200011)20:11<870::AID-PD940>3.0.CO;2-J [DOI:10.1002/1097-0223(200011)20:113.0.CO;2-J]
19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0223(200011)20:11<870::AID-PD940>3.0.CO;2-J.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0223(200011)20:11<870::AID-PD940>3.0.CO;2-J [DOI:10.1002/1097-0223(200011)20:113.0.CO;2-J.]
20. Klintö K, Karsten A, Marcusson A, Paganini A, Rizell S, Cajander J, Brunnegård K, Hakelius M, Okhiria Å, Peterson P, Abdiu A. Coverage, reporting degree and design of the Swedish quality registry for patients born with cleft lip and/or palate. BMC health services research 2020;20(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05389-x]
21. doi:10.1186/s12887-022-03367-2. [DOI:10.1186/s12887-022-03367-2]
22. Ardouin K, Davis S, Stock NM. Physical health in adults born with cleft lip and/or palate: a whole of life survey in the United Kingdom. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2021;58(2):153-162. doi:10.1177/1055665620944758. [DOI:10.1177/1055665620944758]
23. Fuangtharnthip P, Chonnapasatid W, Thiradilok S, Manopatanakul S, Jaruratanasirikul S. Registry-based study of prevalence of cleft lip/palate in Thailand from 2012 to 2015. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 2021;58(11):1430-7. [DOI:10.1177/1055665620987677]
24. doi: 10.1177/1055665620987677. [DOI:10.1177/1055665620987677]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
