WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
Tue, Apr 16, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 11, Issue 2 (2022)
WJPS 2022, 11(2): 135-143 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Tabrizi R, Rezaie P, Sadeghi H M, Malekigorji M, Dehghanpour M. Patients Satisfaction and Nasal Morphologic Change after Orthognathic Surgery. WJPS 2022; 11 (2) :135-143
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-944-en.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-944-en.html
Reza Tabrizi1 
, Paria Rezaie1 , Hassan Mirmohammad Sadeghi1 , Mohsen Malekigorji 2, Mehrdad Dehghanpour1
, Paria Rezaie1 , Hassan Mirmohammad Sadeghi1 , Mohsen Malekigorji 2, Mehrdad Dehghanpour1
1- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , mohsen_malekigorji@yahoo.com
2- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , mohsen_malekigorji@yahoo.com
Abstract: (1427 Views)
Background: Patients' attitudes about their nose changes after orthognathic surgeries. We aimed to evaluate the patient's opinion about nasal change and morphologic changes following orthognathic surgery.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The sample was derived from the population of patients who underwent orthognathic surgery in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran between 2017 and 2019. Subjects who underwent orthognathic surgery were studied. Subjects filled a modified nose evaluation form before and nine months after orthognathic surgery. For objective assessment, the nasolabial angle, nasofrontal angle, nasofacial angle, tip projection, and tip deviation and alar width were evaluated. Sixty-two patients were studied.
Results: Forty (64.5%) patients did not absolutely like their nose before orthognathic surgeries, two (3.2 %) expressed a little satisfaction, 17(27.4%) answered they liked more or less, and three liked very much. Nine months after orthognathic surgeries, 4 (6.5%) patients did not like their nose, nine patients (14.5%) liked a little, 30 (48.4%) liked more or less, and 19 liked very much. Analysis of the data demonstrated a significant difference in patients' satisfaction with their noses before and nine months after orthognathic surgeries (P<0.001). Patients’ satisfaction nine months after orthognathic surgery was not affected by nasal morphologic changes.
Conclusion: It seems, patients' satisfaction with their nose improved after orthognathic surgeries. Patients' attitude was not associated with nasal morphologic changes.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The sample was derived from the population of patients who underwent orthognathic surgery in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran between 2017 and 2019. Subjects who underwent orthognathic surgery were studied. Subjects filled a modified nose evaluation form before and nine months after orthognathic surgery. For objective assessment, the nasolabial angle, nasofrontal angle, nasofacial angle, tip projection, and tip deviation and alar width were evaluated. Sixty-two patients were studied.
Results: Forty (64.5%) patients did not absolutely like their nose before orthognathic surgeries, two (3.2 %) expressed a little satisfaction, 17(27.4%) answered they liked more or less, and three liked very much. Nine months after orthognathic surgeries, 4 (6.5%) patients did not like their nose, nine patients (14.5%) liked a little, 30 (48.4%) liked more or less, and 19 liked very much. Analysis of the data demonstrated a significant difference in patients' satisfaction with their noses before and nine months after orthognathic surgeries (P<0.001). Patients’ satisfaction nine months after orthognathic surgery was not affected by nasal morphologic changes.
Conclusion: It seems, patients' satisfaction with their nose improved after orthognathic surgeries. Patients' attitude was not associated with nasal morphologic changes.
References
1. Schendel SA, Carlotti AE Jr. Nasal considerations in orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991 Sep;100(3):197-208. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70056-3.
2. Seah TE, Bellis H, Ilankovan V. Orthognathic patients with nasal deformities: case for simultaneous orthognathic surgery and rhinoplasty. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012 Jan;50(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.12.009.
3. Dantas WR, Silveira MM, Vasconcelos BC, Porto GG. Evaluation of the nasal shape after orthognathic surgery. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2015 Jan-Feb;81(1):19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.08.005.
4. Balikci HH, Gurdal MM. Satisfaction outcomes in open functional septorhinoplasty: prospective analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2014 Mar;25(2):377-9. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000638.
5. Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF Jr, Anderson S, Murakami CS, Johnson CM Jr. Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001 Jul-Sep;3(3):198-201. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.3.3.198.
6. Jeong HI, Lee HS, Jung YS, Park HS, Jung HD. Nasal Soft Tissue Change Following Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2017 Oct;28(7):e605-e608. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003736.
7. Mitchell C, Oeltjen J, Panthaki Z, Thaller SR. Nasolabial aesthetics. J Craniofac Surg 2007 Jul;18(4):756-65. doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e3180684360.
8. Westermark AH, Bystedt H, Von Konow L, Sällström KO. Nasolabial morphology after Le Fort I osteotomies. Effect of alar base suture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991 Feb;20(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80690-3.
9. Modig M, Andersson L, Wårdh I. Patients' perception of improvement after orthognathic surgery: pilot study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006 Feb;44(1):24-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.07.016.
10. Oh KM, Seo SK, Park JE, Sim HS, Cevidanes LH, Kim YJ, Park YH. Post-operative soft tissue changes in patients with mandibular prognathism after bimaxillary surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013 Apr;41(3):204-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.09.001.
11. Sun AH, Steinbacher DM. Orthognathic Surgery and Rhinoplasty: Simultaneous or Staged? Plast Reconstr Surg 2018 Feb;141(2):322-329. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004020.
12. Pachêco-Pereira C, Abreu LG, Dick BD, De Luca Canto G, Paiva SM, Flores-Mir C. Patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery: A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2016 May;86(3):495-508. doi: 10.2319/040615-227.1.
13. Heliövaara A, Hukki J, Ranta R, Rintala A. Soft tissue profile changes after Le Fort I osteotomy in UCLP patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2000 Feb;28(1):25-30. doi: 10.1054/jcms.2000.0109.
14. Pahkala RH, Kellokoski JK. Surgical-orthodontic treatment and patients' functional and psychosocial well-being. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007 Aug;132(2):158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.033.
15. Soh CL, Narayanan V. Quality of life assessment in patients with dentofacial deformity undergoing orthognathic surgery--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013 Aug;42(8):974-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.03.023.
16. Baherimoghaddam T, Tabrizi R, Naseri N, Pouzesh A, Oshagh M, Torkan S. Assessment of the changes in quality of life of patients with class II and III deformities during and after orthodontic-surgical treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016 Apr;45(4):476-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.019.
17. Geramy A, Sheikhzade S, Nazarifar AM. Cephalometric and Anthropometric Changes and Their Relation to Patients' Satisfaction After Orthognathic Surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2020 Jun;31(4):1022-1025. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006193.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
