Volume 14, Issue 1 (2025)                   WJPS 2025, 14(1): 59-63 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Grados J D J O, Alexander C M, Enrique V Z, Jimena M O, Jose Antonio G G. Presence of Martin-Gruber Anastomosis among a Cohort of Mexican Origin; a Corpse Dissection Study. WJPS 2025; 14 (1) :59-63
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1384-en.html
1- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital Angeles de Querétaro, Queretaro, Mexico
2- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
3- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico
4- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
Abstract:   (458 Views)

Background: At the forearm level, Martin-Gruber anastomosis is described as the most common anatomic variation. Early recognition of this anastomosis in patients with peripheral nerve lesions and preserved function of the hand musculature lowers the rate of misdiagnosis and prevents unnecessary treatment approaches. We aimed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of Martin-Gruber anastomosis in a Mexican cohort and discuss its impact on clinical diagnostics and approach.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional dissection study on 40 inert anatomical models at the National Forensic Sciences Institute in Mexico City. Each model was dissected to trace and measure Martin-Gruber anastomoses from the median nerve to the ulnar nerve. Measurements were recorded using a digital Vernier caliper, and the presence of anastomosis, its length, nerve of origin, and side were analyzed. Chi-square tests evaluated the association between the presence of anastomoses and sex, and nerve origin and arm side.
Results: Martin-Gruber anastomosis was found in 47.5% of the specimens, with bilateral anastomoses in 11 and unilateral in eight. The majority of anastomoses (62.5%) originated from the left arm. There was no significant association between the presence of anastomosis and sex (P=0.093) or between the nerve origin and arm side (P=0.809).
Conclusion: The high prevalence of Martin-Gruber anastomosis in this study highlights its clinical importance, particularly in preventing misdiagnoses of ulnar nerve injuries and unnecessary surgical interventions. Anatomical variations like Martin-Gruber anastomosis should be considered in clinical assessments of peripheral nerve injuries to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes.
 
Full-Text [PDF 397 kb]   (172 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Special
ePublished: 2025/04/5

References
1. Duinslaeger L, DeBacker A, Ceulemans L, et al. Ulnar nerve injury with martin-gruber anastomosis.Eur J Plast Surg 1987; 10:37-39. [DOI:10.1007/BF00295651]
2. Leis AA, Stetkarova I, Wells KJ. Martin-Gruber anastomosis with anomalous superficial radial innervation to ulnar dorsum of hand: A pitfall when common variants coexist. Muscle & Nerve 2010; 41(3):313-317. doi:10.1002/mus.21510 [DOI:10.1002/mus.21510]
3. Kazakos KJ, Smyrnis A, Xarchas KC, Dimitrakopoulou A, Verettas DA. Anastomosis between the median and ulnar nerve in the forearm. An anatomic study and literature review. Acta Orthop Belg 2005; 71(1):29-35.
4. Diz‐Díaz J, Gómez‐Muñoz E, Sañudo J, Maranillo E, Pascual‐Font A, Vazquez T. Which is the function of a martin‐gruber connection? Clinical Anatomy 2019; 32(4):501-508. doi:10.1002/ca.23339 [DOI:10.1002/ca.23339]
5. Kaur N, Singla RK, Kullar JS. Martin-Gruber Anastomosis- A Cadaveric Study in North Indian Population. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10(2):AC09-11. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/16447.7247 [DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2016/16447.7247]
6. Crutchfield CA, Gutmann L. Hereditary aspects of median-ulnar nerve communications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980; 43(1):53-55. doi:10.1136/jnnp.43.1.53 [DOI:10.1136/jnnp.43.1.53]
7. Cavalheiro CS, Filho MR, Pedro G, Caetano MF, Vieira LA, Caetano EB. Clinical repercussions of Martin-Gruber anastomosis: anatomical study. Rev Bras Ortop 2016; 51(2):214-223. doi:10.1016/j.rboe.2016.02.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.rboe.2016.02.003]
8. Caetano EB, Vieira LÂ, Caetano MF, Cavalheiro CS, Razuk M, Sabongi JJ. Intramuscular martin-gruber anastomosis. Acta Ortop Bras 2016; 24(2):94-97. doi:10.1590/1413-785220162402149097 [DOI:10.1590/1413-785220162402149097]
9. Sur A, Sinha M, Ughade J. Prevalence of Martin-Gruber Anastomosis in Healthy Subjects: An Electrophysiological Study from Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Neurol India 2021; 69(4):950. doi:10.4103/0028-3886.325369 [DOI:10.4103/0028-3886.325369]
10. Hefny M, Sallam A, Abdellatif M, Okasha S, Orabi M. Electrophysiological Evaluation and Clinical Implication of Martin-Gruber Anastomosis in Healthy Subjects. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol 2020; 25(1):87-94. doi:10.1142/S2424835520500125 [DOI:10.1142/S2424835520500125]
11. Unver Dogan N, Uysal II, Seker M. The communications between the ulnar and median nerves in upper limb. Neuroanatomy 2009; 8:15-19.
12. Kretschmer T, Heinen CW, Antoniadis G, Richter HP, König RW. Iatrogenic nerve injuries. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2009; 20(1):73-vii. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2008.07.025 [DOI:10.1016/j.nec.2008.07.025]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | World Journal of Plastic Surgery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb