مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
مجله جهانی جراحی پلاستیک
شنبه 1 شهریور 1404
[Archive]
چکیده: (334 مشاهده)
Background: One of the most important stages in rhinoplasty is the control of nasal tip rotation. Different techniques have been proposed to achieve this goal. We aimed to compare the effects of two methods of Septocolumellar Suture (SCS) and Lateral Crural Overlay (LCO) on nasal tip rotation by measuring of Columella-Labial angle.
Methods: In a single-blinded clinical trial, 148 patients were selected among the patients who were candidates for rhinoplasty in Sina Hospital in Tehran, Iran 2024. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (each group contained 74 subjects). The patients in the first group were operated on using LCO technique, and the patients in the second group were operated on using SCS technique. Columella-Labial angle of the samples were evaluated using the photographs of the samples before and six months after surgery. The obtained results were compared using SPSS software and t-paired and Mann-Whitney statistical tests.
Results: The mean Columella-Labial angle in both groups was more than that before surgery (P<0.001). The mean Columella-Labial angle before surgery in the SCS group were higher than that in LCO group and this difference was significant (P<0.001). The Columella-Labial angle difference was also significant between the two groups after surgery (P = 0.005), and Columella-Labial angle in LCO group was higher than that in SCS group (P <0.001).
Conclusion: LCO technique increase Columella-Labial angle more than SCS technique. Therefore, it is recommended that LCO technique to be used in patients with who need greater Columella-Labial angle change.
Methods: In a single-blinded clinical trial, 148 patients were selected among the patients who were candidates for rhinoplasty in Sina Hospital in Tehran, Iran 2024. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (each group contained 74 subjects). The patients in the first group were operated on using LCO technique, and the patients in the second group were operated on using SCS technique. Columella-Labial angle of the samples were evaluated using the photographs of the samples before and six months after surgery. The obtained results were compared using SPSS software and t-paired and Mann-Whitney statistical tests.
Results: The mean Columella-Labial angle in both groups was more than that before surgery (P<0.001). The mean Columella-Labial angle before surgery in the SCS group were higher than that in LCO group and this difference was significant (P<0.001). The Columella-Labial angle difference was also significant between the two groups after surgery (P = 0.005), and Columella-Labial angle in LCO group was higher than that in SCS group (P <0.001).
Conclusion: LCO technique increase Columella-Labial angle more than SCS technique. Therefore, it is recommended that LCO technique to be used in patients with who need greater Columella-Labial angle change.
نوع مطالعه: مقالات اصيل |
موضوع مقاله:
تخصصي
فهرست منابع
1. Xie Y, Seth I, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM, Ross R, Lee M. Aesthetic surgery advice and counseling from artificial intelligence: a rhinoplasty consultation with ChatGPT. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023;47(5):1985-93. [DOI:10.1007/s00266-023-03338-7]
2. Razmara F, Ghorani NS, Dehghani N, Mahmoudi X. Satisfaction Level of Patients with the Outcome of Genioplasty. World J Plast Surg 2024;13(2):58. [DOI:10.61186/wjps.13.2.58]
3. Gandomi B, Arzaghi MH, Rafatbakhsh M. The effectiveness of modified vertical dome division technique in reducing nasal tip projection in rhinoplasty. Iran J Med Sci 2011;36(3):196.
4. Guyuron B, Behmand RA. Nasal tip sutures part II: the interplays. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112(4):1130-45. [DOI:10.1097/01.PRS.0000076505.83375.74]
5. Foda HM, Kridel RW. Lateral crural steal and lateral crural overlay: an objective evaluation. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery 1999;125(12):1365-70. [DOI:10.1001/archotol.125.12.1365]
6. Howard BK, Robricb RJ. Understanding the nasal airway: principles and practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109(3):1145-6. [DOI:10.1097/00006534-200203000-00055]
7. Khorasani G, Hasani O, Farahvash M. Comparison of Septocolumellar Suture (SCS) and Lateral Crural Overlay (LCO) methods on nasal tip projection and rotation in rhinoplasty. Tehran University Medical Journal 2010;68(8).
8. Kuran I, Öreroğlu AR, Efendioğlu K. The lateral crural rein flap: a novel technique for management of tip rotation in primary rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2014;34(7):1008-17. [DOI:10.1177/1090820X14541957]
9. Papel ID. Quantitative facial aesthetic evaluation with computer imaging. Facial Plast Surg 1990;7(01):35-44. [DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1064662]
10. Gubisch W, Eichhorn-Sens J. The sliding technique: a method to treat the overprojected nasal tip. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008;32:772-8. [DOI:10.1007/s00266-008-9211-1]
11. Lo S, Rowe-Jones J. Suture techniques in nasal tip sculpture: current concepts. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2007;121(8):E10. [DOI:10.1017/S0022215107008973]
12. Tebbetts J, Daniel R. Open rhinoplasty: more than an incisional approach. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Rhinoplasty Boston: Little, Brown 1993:525-54.
13. 13 Tebbetts JB. Shaping and positioning the nasal tip without structural disruption: a new, systematic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;94(1):61-77. [DOI:10.1097/00006534-199407000-00006]
14. Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: A simplified, three-stitch, open tip suture technique. Part I: Primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103(5):1491-502. [DOI:10.1097/00006534-199904020-00022]
15. Gruber RP, Weintraub J, Pomerantz J. Suture techniques for the nasal tip. Aesthet Surg J 2008;28(1):92-100. [DOI:10.1016/j.asj.2007.10.004]
16. Tezel E, Numanoglu A. Septocolumellar suture in closed rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2007;59(3):268-72. [DOI:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31802e0930]
17. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP. Dallas rhinoplasty: nasal surgery by the masters: Quality Medical Pub.; 2002.
18. Kridel RW, Konior RJ. Controlled nasal tip rotation via the lateral crural overlay technique. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery 1991;117(4):411-5. [DOI:10.1001/archotol.1991.01870160065011]
19. Kridel RW, Konior RJ, Shumrick KA, Wright WK. Advances in nasal tip surgery: the lateral crural steal. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery 1989;115(10):1206-12. [DOI:10.1001/archotol.1989.01860340060018]
20. Foda HM. Management of the droopy tip: a comparison of three alar cartilage-modifying techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112(5):1408-17. [DOI:10.1097/01.PRS.0000081065.48569.43]
21. Janeke J, Wright W. Studies on the support of the nasal tip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972;49(1):102. [DOI:10.1097/00006534-197201000-00033]
22. Kridel RW, Konior RJ. Dome truncation for management of the overprojected nasal tip. Ann Plast Surg 1990;24(5):385-96. [DOI:10.1097/00000637-199005000-00001]
23. Scattolin A, D'Ascanio L, Galzignato P-F, et al. Algorithm for the Treatment of Tip Malformation Combining a Clinical Qualitative Assessment and Specific Closed-Rhinoplasty Techniques Based on Retrospective Analysis of Pellegrini's Fellows 40 Years' Experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024:1-11. [DOI:10.1007/s00266-024-04310-9]
24. Korkmaz M, Korkmaz H. The comparison between alar cartilage shortening and columellar-septal suture techniques in nasal tip rotation. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26(3):876-80. [DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000001366]
25. Ingels K, Orhan KS. Measurement of preoperative and postoperative nasal tip projection and rotation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006. [DOI:10.1001/archfaci.8.6.411]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
