WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
Sun, Apr 28, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 13, Issue 1 (2024)
WJPS 2024, 13(1): 43-49 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Tabrizi A G, Ghazizadeh M, Rootivand Z. Harmonizing Beauty and Function: A Comprehensive Exploration of Patient Satisfaction in Rhinoplasty. WJPS 2024; 13 (1) :43-49
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1227-en.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1227-en.html
1- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , matinghazizadeh@hotmail.com
2- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , matinghazizadeh@hotmail.com
Abstract: (456 Views)
Background: Rhinoplasty has become a globally prevalent esthetic procedure, necessitating precise facial analysis and comprehensive preoperative planning for favorable postoperative outcomes. We aimed to assess patient satisfaction levels concerning nasal appearance following rhinoplasty.
Methods: A case series interventional study was conducted involving 52 subjects referred to Rhinoplasty Clinics of Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran from Mar 2021 to Mar 2022. Patients' satisfaction levels were evaluated using a concise checklist before and three months after surgery.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 29.23 ± 7.26 years, with 19 (36.5%) being male. Statistically significant improvements were observed in all assessed factors, including nasal obstruction, nasal size, hump presence, nasal bridge width, nasal tip bulbosity, nasal deviation, radix, nostril asymmetry, and tip ptosis (P < 0.001). These findings reveal a consistent pattern of patients' satisfaction levels predominantly shifting from moderate to low across various aspects of nasal appearance post-rhinoplasty.
Conclusion: The study demonstrated a significant enhancement in patients' satisfaction with their nasal appearance following rhinoplasty, indicated by statistically significant changes across all assessed factors. However, certain aspects exhibit more limited enhancement.
References
1. Rohrich RJ, Ahmad J. Rhinoplasty. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2011;128(2):49e-73e. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821e7191]
2. Daniel RK. The preservation rhinoplasty: a new rhinoplasty revolution. Oxford University Press US; 2018. p. 228-9. [DOI:10.1093/asj/sjx258]
3. de Souza OE, Lavinsky‐Wolff M, Migliavacca RO, de Azeredo AM, Colognese Gabbardo AV, Velho JS. Analysis of Determinants of Postoperative Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty. The Laryngoscope 2022;132(8):1569-75. [DOI:10.1002/lary.29923]
4. Kotzampasakis D, Delistathi T, Kotzampasakis S, Mantalos P. Aesthetic Rhinoplasty and Nasal Obstruction: Presentation of Results of a 100-Patient Study by Using NOSE Inventory. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2019 Apr;43(2):428-36. [DOI:10.1007/s00266-019-01316-6]
5. Wähmann MS, Bulut OC, Bran GM, Veit JA, Riedel F. Systematic Review of Quality-of-Life Measurement After Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018 Dec;42(6):1635-47. [DOI:10.1007/s00266-018-1199-6]
6. Woodard CR, Park SS. Nasal and facial analysis. Clin Plast Surg 2010 Apr;37(2):181-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.cps.2009.12.006]
7. Ballin AC, Carvalho B, Dolci JEL, Becker R, Berger C, Mocellin M. Anthropometric study of the caucasian nose in the city of Curitiba: relevance of population evaluation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2018 Jul-Aug;84(4):486-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.06.004]
8. Gonzales PS, Machado CEP, Michel-Crosato E. Analysis of Neoclassical Facial Canons for Brazilian White Young Adults and Comparison With North American Caucasian Population. J Craniofac Surg 2020 Jul-Aug;31(5):e432-e5. [DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000006339]
9. Zojaji R, Sobhani E, Keshavarzmanesh M, Dehghan P, Meshkat M. The Association Between Facial Proportions and Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Prospective Study. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2019 May;27(2):167-72. [DOI:10.1177/2292550319826097]
10. Torsello F, Mirigliani L, D'Alessio R, Deli R. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models. Prog Orthod 2010;11(1):13-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.pio.2010.04.003]
11. Radulesco T, Penicaud M, Santini L, Thomassin JM, Dessi P, Michel J. Outcomes of septorhinoplasty: a new approach comparing functional and aesthetic results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018 Feb;47(2):175-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2017.09.002]
12. Alsubeeh NA, AlSaqr MA, Alkarzae M, Aldosari B. Prevalence of considering revision rhinoplasty in Saudi patients and its associated factors. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2019 Dec;41(1):59. [DOI:10.1186/s40902-019-0237-x]
13. Yamasaki A, Levesque PA, Bleier BS, et al. Improvement in nasal obstruction and quality of life after septorhinoplasty and turbinate surgery. Laryngoscope 2019 Jul;129(7):1554-60. [DOI:10.1002/lary.27859]
14. van der Lei B, Bouman TK. Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Patients Seeking Abdominoplasty, Rhinoplasty, and Rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016 Sep;138(3):553e-4e. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002443]
15. Ramos TD, de Brito MJA, Suzuki VY, Sabino Neto M, Ferreira LM. High Prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Moderate to Severe Appearance-Related Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms Among Rhinoplasty Candidates. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2019 Aug;43(4):1000-5. [DOI:10.1007/s00266-018-1300-1]
16. Guyuron B, Bokhari F. Patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1996 Mar-Apr;20(2):153-7. [DOI:10.1007/BF02275535]
17. Arima LM, Velasco LC, Tiago RSL. Nariz torto: avaliação de resultados em rinoplastia. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology 2011;77:510-5. [DOI:10.1590/S1808-86942011000400016]
18. Balikci HH, Gurdal MM. Satisfaction outcomes in open functional septorhinoplasty: prospective analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2014 Mar;25(2):377-9. [DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000000638]
19. Schwitzer JA, Sher SR, Fan KL, Scott AM, Gamble L, Baker SB. Assessing Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Appearance and Quality of Life following Rhinoplasty Using the FACE-Q Appraisal Scales. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015 May;135(5):830e-7e. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001159]
20. Khansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD. Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media Analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2016 Jan;36(1):Np1-5. [DOI:10.1093/asj/sjv095]
21. Rezaei F, Rezaei F, Abbasi H, Moradi H. A Comparison of Doctor/Patient Satisfaction with Aesthetic Outcomes of Rhinoplasty: a Prospective Study. J Med Life 2019 Oct-Dec;12(4):374-80. [DOI:10.25122/jml-2019-0061]
22. Yang F, Liu Y, Xiao H, Li Y, Cun H, Zhao Y. Evaluation of Preoperative and Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018 Mar;141(3):603-11. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000004102]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
