WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
Fri, Jan 3, 2025
[Archive]
Volume 13, Issue 2 (2024)
WJPS 2024, 13(2): 32-38 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Farhadifard H, Shokri A, Salehzadeh M, Farhadian M, Ahmadpour Y. Evalution of the Relation between Maxillary Canine Impaction with Arch Dimensions and Maxillary Sinus Dimensions Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT ). WJPS 2024; 13 (2) :32-38
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1284-en.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1284-en.html
1- Dental Implants Research Center, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Dental Implants Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3- Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, tabriz, Iran.
4- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
5- Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
2- Dental Implants Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3- Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, tabriz, Iran.
4- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
5- Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
Abstract: (1354 Views)
Background: We aimed to evaluate the morphology of maxilla and sinus dimension in subjects with unilaterally and bilaterally impacted canine using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) records.
Methods: CBCT records taken during 2020-2022 of 120 patients were obtained to investigate the relationship between impacted canine and maxilla morphology as well as sinus dimension. The CBCT images were then divided into three control, unilaterally and bilaterally canine impaction groups. Then morphology-related variables (arch circumference and arch length , inter molar width, inter first molar width, palatal depth, anterior posterior of right and left side sinus, and mediolateral dimension of right and left side sinus) were analyzed and compared between groups. All measurements was measured by Ondeman3D dental software, the unit of measurement was millimeter. Statistical analysis was carried out by SPSS software version 21 using one-way ANOVA and post hoc tests.
Results: In patients with canine impaction (compared with control group), there were meaningful differences in arch circumference (P value= 0.004) and arch length (P value= 0.001), inter molar width (P value= 0.001), inter first premolar width (P value= 0.001), mediolateral dimension of right (P value=0.001) and left side (P value= 0.001) sinus of maxilla. Furthermore, Palatal depth and anterior posterior of right and left sinuses were not statistically significant difference between groups.
Conclusion: Canine impaction can considerably affect the morphology of maxillary and sinuses dimension. Nevertheless, future studies are needed to determine the exact structural and molecular effects that canine impaction can have on maxillary sinuses and neighboring tissues.
Methods: CBCT records taken during 2020-2022 of 120 patients were obtained to investigate the relationship between impacted canine and maxilla morphology as well as sinus dimension. The CBCT images were then divided into three control, unilaterally and bilaterally canine impaction groups. Then morphology-related variables (arch circumference and arch length , inter molar width, inter first molar width, palatal depth, anterior posterior of right and left side sinus, and mediolateral dimension of right and left side sinus) were analyzed and compared between groups. All measurements was measured by Ondeman3D dental software, the unit of measurement was millimeter. Statistical analysis was carried out by SPSS software version 21 using one-way ANOVA and post hoc tests.
Results: In patients with canine impaction (compared with control group), there were meaningful differences in arch circumference (P value= 0.004) and arch length (P value= 0.001), inter molar width (P value= 0.001), inter first premolar width (P value= 0.001), mediolateral dimension of right (P value=0.001) and left side (P value= 0.001) sinus of maxilla. Furthermore, Palatal depth and anterior posterior of right and left sinuses were not statistically significant difference between groups.
Conclusion: Canine impaction can considerably affect the morphology of maxillary and sinuses dimension. Nevertheless, future studies are needed to determine the exact structural and molecular effects that canine impaction can have on maxillary sinuses and neighboring tissues.
References
1. Ajami S, Shahidi S, Azadeh N,Naser Jalali H, Zare M. Difficulty of palatal impacted canine treatment in different sagittal and vertical skeletal malocclusions: a retrospective 3D evaluation. Int Orthod 2020; 18(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.11.001. [DOI:10.1016/j.ortho.2019.11.001]
2. Dalessandri D, Migliorati M, Visconti L, Contardo L, How Kau C, Martin C. KPG index versus OPG measurements: a comparison between 3D and 2D methods in predicting treatment duration and difficulty level for patients with impacted maxillary canines. Biomed Res Int 2014:2014:537620. doi: 10.1155/2014/537620. [DOI:10.1155/2014/537620]
3. Sunil G, Ranganayakulu L, Ranghu Ram R. Maxillary canine impaction-A hitch in orthodontic treatment planning. IAIM 2018; 5(6): 72-76.
4. Lai C S, Bornstein M M, Mock L, Heuberger B M, Dietrich T, Katsaros C. Impacted maxillary canines and root resorptions of neighbouring teeth: a radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Orthod 2013;35(4):529-38. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs037. [DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjs037]
5. Andreasen J O, Peterson J, Laskin D M. Textbook and color atlas of tooth impactions: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention. Elsevier - Health Sciences Division, 1997.pp:354 [DOI:10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70128-8]
6. Becker A. The orthodontic treatment of impacted teeth. Wiley,1998.
7. Abron A, Mendro R, Kaplan S. Impacted permanent maxillary canines. N Y State Dent J 2004;70(9):24-8.
8. Mason C, Papadakou P, Roberts G J.The radiographic localization of impacted maxillary canines: a comparison of methods. Eur J Orthod 2001;23(1):25-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.1.25. [DOI:10.1093/ejo/23.1.25]
9. Lindauer S J, Rubenstein L K, Hang W M, Andersen W C, Isaacson R J. Canine impaction identified early with panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123(3):91-2, 95-7 doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1992.0069. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.1992.0069]
10. Thilander B Myrberg N.The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Scand J Dent Res 1973;81(1):12-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1973.tb01489.x. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1973.tb01489.x]
11. Ericson S Kurol J. Resorption of incisors after ectopic eruption of maxillary canines: a CT study.
12. Angle Orthod 2000;70(6):415-23. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0415:ROIAEE>2.0.CO;2.
13. Becker A Chaushu S.Etiology of maxillary canine impaction: A review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;148(4):557-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.013. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.013]
14. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Lambrechts P, Loozen G, Willems G. Root resorption of the maxillary lateral incisor caused by impacted canine: a literature review. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13(3):247-55. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0262-8. [DOI:10.1007/s00784-009-0262-8]
15. Oz A Z,. Oz A A, EL H, Palomo J M.Maxillary sinus volume in patients with impacted canines.
16. Angle Orthod 2017;87(1):25-32. doi: 10.2319/122915-895.1. [DOI:10.2319/122915-895.1]
17. Emirzeoglu M, Sahin B, Bilgic S, Celebi M, Uzun A. Volumetric evaluation of the paranasal sinuses in normal subjects using computer tomography images: a stereological study. Auris Nasus Larynx 2007;34(2):191-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2006.09.003. [DOI:10.1016/j.anl.2006.09.003]
18. Endo T, Abe R, Kuroki H, Kojima K, Oka K, Shimooka S. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary sinus sizes in different malocclusion classes. Odontology 2010;98(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s10266-009-0108-5. [DOI:10.1007/s10266-009-0108-5]
19. Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study.
20. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):48-56.
21. El H, Stefanovic N, Palomo J M, Palomo L. Strategies for Managing the Risk of Mucogingival Changes During Impacted Maxillary Canine Treatment. Turk J Orthod 2020;33(2):123-132. [DOI:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20038]
22. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20038. eCollection 2020 Jun. [DOI:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20038]
23. Ba K D, Diouf J S, Badiane A, Ngom P I, Diagne F. Orthopantomographic analysis of the intraosseus position of the maxillary canines. Int Orthod 2019;17(2):324-332. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Apr 12. [DOI:10.1016/j.ortho.2019.03.015]
24. Grybienė V, Juozėnaitė D, Kubiliūtė K. Diagnostic methods and treatment strategies of impacted maxillary canines: A literature review. Stomatologija 2019;21(1):3-12.
25. Tadinada A, Mahdian M, Vishwanath M, Allareddy V, Upadhyay M, Yadav S. Evaluation of alveolar bone dimensions in unilateral palatally impacted canine: a cone-beam computed tomographic analyses. Eur J Orthod 2015;37(6):596-602. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju098. [DOI:10.1093/ejo/cju098]
26. Baumgaertel SPalomo J M, Palomo L, Hans M G. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.016. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.016]
27. Saccucci M, Cipriani F, Carderi S, Di Carlo G, D'Attilio M, Rodolfino D, Festa F. A Polimeni Gender assessment through three-dimensional analysis of maxillary sinuses by means of cone beam computed tomography. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015;19(2):185-93.
28. Kim Y, K. Hyun H-K, Jang K-T. Interrelationship between the position of impacted maxillary canines and the morphology of the maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141(5):556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.11.015 [DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.11.015]
29. Mohamed Elmarhoumy S, Safwat W, Ellaithy M. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in patients with unilaterally maxillary impacted canines. Egyptian Dental Journal 2022; 68(2): 1165-1170. DOI: 10.21608/edj.2022.111105.1911 [DOI:10.21608/edj.2022.111105.1911]
30. Al-Nimri K , Gharaibeh T. Space conditions and dental and occlusal features in patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines: an aetiological study. Eur J Orthod 2005;27(5):461-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji022. [DOI:10.1093/ejo/cji022]
31. Cacciatore G, Poletti L, Sforza C. Early diagnosed impacted maxillary canines and the morphology of the maxilla: a three-dimensional study. Prog Orthod 2018;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0220-6. [DOI:10.1186/s40510-018-0220-6]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
