WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
Thu, Dec 11, 2025
[Archive]
Volume 14, Issue 3 (2025)
WJPS 2025, 14(3): 63-69 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
A. Argame A, I. Chen J, B. Eby J, Masoomi H. Safety of Simultaneous Contralateral Breast Symmetry Procedure in Unilateral Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. WJPS 2025; 14 (3) :63-69
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1561-en.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-1561-en.html
1- Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California, USA
2- Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California, USA & Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente South Bay Medical Center, Harbor City, California, USA
3- Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente South Bay Medical Center, Harbor City, California, USA
4- Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente South Bay Medical Center, Harbor City, California, USA ,hossein.masoomi@kp.org
2- Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California, USA & Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente South Bay Medical Center, Harbor City, California, USA
3- Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente South Bay Medical Center, Harbor City, California, USA
4- Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente South Bay Medical Center, Harbor City, California, USA ,
Abstract: (188 Views)
Background: Contralateral breast symmetry procedure is often required to achieve symmetry following unilateral breast reconstruction. No
consensus exists regarding timing of contralateral symmetry procedure. We investigated frequency and safety of simultaneous contralateral breast
symmetry procedure in unilateral free flap breast reconstruction using a large nationwide database.
Methods: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Project database, we examined clinical data of patients who
underwent immediate or delayed unilateral free flap breast reconstruction from 2016 to 2020 in the United States. Patients were divided in two groups:
with or without simultaneous contralateral reduction mammoplasty or mastopexy.
Results: Overall, 5.429 patients underwent unilateral free flap-based breast reconstruction. Simultaneous symmetrization was reported in only 8% of
these patients. There was no significant difference in overall complication rate (without: 15.9% vs. with: 15.2%), unplanned return to the operating
room rate (without: 10.9% vs. with: 8.3%), mean length of hospital stay (without: 3.8 vs. with: 3.5 day) and unplanned re-admission rate (without:
5.5% vs. with: 4.1%) between two groups. Additionally, multivariate regression analyses showed simultaneous symmetrization was not associated
with higher complication rate, higher unplanned return to the operating room rate, higher readmission rate, nor longer length of hospital stay after
adjusting for patient’s characteristics, comorbidities and immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction.
Conclusion: Simultaneous symmetrization was performed infrequently with unilateral free flap breast reconstruction. Our study showed simultaneous
symmetrization is safe and associated with a comparable perioperative outcome. Consideration in appropriate patients will likely reduce the number
of revisions for those undergoing unilateral free flap breast reconstruction.
consensus exists regarding timing of contralateral symmetry procedure. We investigated frequency and safety of simultaneous contralateral breast
symmetry procedure in unilateral free flap breast reconstruction using a large nationwide database.
Methods: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Project database, we examined clinical data of patients who
underwent immediate or delayed unilateral free flap breast reconstruction from 2016 to 2020 in the United States. Patients were divided in two groups:
with or without simultaneous contralateral reduction mammoplasty or mastopexy.
Results: Overall, 5.429 patients underwent unilateral free flap-based breast reconstruction. Simultaneous symmetrization was reported in only 8% of
these patients. There was no significant difference in overall complication rate (without: 15.9% vs. with: 15.2%), unplanned return to the operating
room rate (without: 10.9% vs. with: 8.3%), mean length of hospital stay (without: 3.8 vs. with: 3.5 day) and unplanned re-admission rate (without:
5.5% vs. with: 4.1%) between two groups. Additionally, multivariate regression analyses showed simultaneous symmetrization was not associated
with higher complication rate, higher unplanned return to the operating room rate, higher readmission rate, nor longer length of hospital stay after
adjusting for patient’s characteristics, comorbidities and immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction.
Conclusion: Simultaneous symmetrization was performed infrequently with unilateral free flap breast reconstruction. Our study showed simultaneous
symmetrization is safe and associated with a comparable perioperative outcome. Consideration in appropriate patients will likely reduce the number
of revisions for those undergoing unilateral free flap breast reconstruction.
References
1. Sgarzani R, Negosanti L, Morselli PG, Vietti Michelina
2. V, Lapalorcia LM, Cipriani R. Patient Satisfaction and
3. Quality of Life in DIEAP Flap versus Implant Breast
4. Reconstruction. Surg Res Pract 2015;2015:405163.
5. doi:10.1155/2015/405163. [DOI:10.1155/2015/405163]
6. Fischer JP, Wes AM, Nelson JA, et al. Propensity-
7. matched, longitudinal outcomes analysis of
8. complications and cost: comparing abdominal free
9. flaps and implant-based breast reconstruction. J
10. Am Coll Surg 2014;219(2):303-312. doi:10.1016/j.
11. jamcollsurg.2014.02.028. [DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/028]
12. Sampathkumar U, Bui T, Liu J, et al. Objective Analysis
13. of Breast Symmetry in Female Patients Undergoing
14. Breast Reconstruction After Total Mastectomy.
15. Aesthetic Surg J Open Forum 2023;5:ojac090.
16. doi:10.1093/asjof/ojac090. [DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojac090]
17. Razdan SN, Panchal H, Albornoz CR, et al. Impact
18. of Contralateral Symmetry Procedures on Long-
19. Term Patient-Reported Outcomes following
20. Unilateral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.
21. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019;35(2):124-128. [DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1667365]
22. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1667365. [DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1667365]
23. Smith ML, Clarke-Pearson EM, Vornovitsky M,
24. Dayan JH, Samson W, Sultan MR. The efficacy of
25. simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral
26. balancing procedures in reducing the need for second
27. stage operations. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41(5):535-541. [DOI:10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.535]
28. doi:10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.535. [DOI:10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.535]
29. Huang JJ, Chao LF, Wu CW, Nguyen DH, Valerio IL,
30. Cheng MH. Simultaneous scarless contralateral breast
31. augmentation during unilateral breast reconstruction
32. using bilateral differentially split DIEP flaps. Plast
33. Reconstr Surg 2011;128(6):593e-604e. doi:10.1097/ [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c312]
34. PRS.0b013e318230c312.
35. Chang EI, Selber JC, Chang EI, et al. Choosing
36. the optimal timing for contralateral symmetry
37. procedures after unilateral free flap breast
38. reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2015 74(1):12-16.
39. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828bb1e3. [DOI:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828bb1e3]
40. Wade RG, Marongiu F, Sassoon EM, Haywood RM,
41. Ali RS, Figus A. Contralateral breast symmetrisation
42. in unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Plast
43. Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS 2016;69(10):1363- [DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.009]
44. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.009. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.009]
45. Giordano S, Harkkila S, Oranges CM, di Summa PG,
46. Koskivuo I. Immediate versus Delayed Contralateral
47. Breast Symmetrisation in Breast Reconstruction
48. with Latissimus dorsi Flap: A Comparative Study.
49. Breast Care Basel Switz 2019;14(5):272-276. [DOI:10.1159/000502769]
50. doi:10.1159/000502769. [DOI:10.1159/000502769]
51. Peltristo B, Chicco M, Molina A. Immediate versus
52. delayed contralateral symmetrisation in autologous
53. breast reconstruction: A comparative study. J Plast
54. Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS 2025;104:321-327. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2025.03.028]
55. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2025.03.028. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2025.03.028]
56. Rizki H, Nkonde C, Ching RC, Kumiponjera D,
57. Malata CM. Plastic surgical management of the
58. contralateral breast in post-mastectomy breast
59. reconstruction. Int J Surg Lond Engl 2013;11(9):767-
60. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.06.844. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.06.844]
61. Breast Cancer Statistics, 2022 - Giaquinto - 2022 -
62. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians - Wiley Online
63. Library. Accessed May 31, 2025. https://acsjournals.
64. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3322/caac.21754.
65. Nasser JS, Chung WHJ, Gudal RA, Kotsis SV, Momoh
66. AO, Chung KC. Quality Measures in Postmastectomy
67. Breast Reconstruction: Identifying Metrics to Improve
68. Care. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020;8(2):e2630.
69. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002630. [DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002630]
70. Kaviani A, Safavi A, Mirsharifi R. Immediate
71. and Delayed Contralateral Symmetrization in
72. Oncoplastic Breast Reduction: Patients' Choices
73. and Technique Formulation. Plast Reconstr
74. Surg Glob Open 2015;3(1):e286. doi:10.1097/ [DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000000246]
75. GOX.0000000000000246.
76. Koesters EC, Chang DW. Radiation and free
77. flaps: what is the optimal timing? Gland Surg
78. 2023;12(8):1122-1130. doi:10.21037/gs-23-154. [DOI:10.21037/gs-23-154]
79. Laporta R, Longo B, Sorotos M, Pagnoni M,
80. Santanelli Di Pompeo F. One-stage DIEP flap
81. breast reconstruction: Algorithm for immediate
82. contralateral symmetrization. Microsurgery.
83. 2016;36(1):7-19. doi:10.1002/micr.22390. [DOI:10.1002/micr.22390]
84. Costanzo D, Romeo A. Surgical Site Infections
85. in Breast Surgery - A Primer for Plastic Surgeons
86. Eplasty 2023 Mar 22:23:e18.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
