WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
Thu, Apr 25, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 11, Issue 3 (2022)
WJPS 2022, 11(3): 13-23 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hagiga A, Aly M, Kadhum M, Christopoulos G. Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of the Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Reconstruction of Upper Limb Defects: A Systematic Review. WJPS 2022; 11 (3) :13-23
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-980-en.html
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-980-en.html
1- Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, East Grinstead, United Kingdom
2- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
2- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Abstract: (1060 Views)
Background: Soft tissue coverage in the upper limb after trauma, burn injury, or tumour removal is a commonly addressed problem by the plastic surgeon. The anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) is recognized as a popular free flap option for covering various types of soft tissue defects due to its versatility. We aimed to assess the functional and aesthetic outcomes of the ALT flap for reconstruction of upper limb defects.
Methods: Four electronic databases were searched (MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane) from inception to Feb 2021. Two reviewers independently extracted the data and performed risk assessment using the modified Downs and Black (MDB) quality assessment tool and the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale for case series.
Results: This review included seven studies for quantitative assessment. The eligible studies had 67 patients. Included studies had used a varied number of validated upper extremity functional scoring systems; the most commonly used score was QuickDASH with mean of 21.24, DASH score was 15.5. In regard to aesthetic outcome, an overall satisfactory result was reported. A secondary debulking procedure was performed in 7 patients.
Conclusion: Further studies are recommended to ascertain the functional and aesthetic outcomes of the ALT free flap for upper limb defects, especially using standardized outcome scoring systems. This may be supplemented with a questionnaire that addresses common patient concerns (such as colour, contour, textile and hair growth) for the aesthetic outcome. Nevertheless, based on our review, the ALT flap may be a good reliable reconstructive option for upper limb defects with good functional outcome and satisfactory aesthetic results.
Methods: Four electronic databases were searched (MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane) from inception to Feb 2021. Two reviewers independently extracted the data and performed risk assessment using the modified Downs and Black (MDB) quality assessment tool and the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale for case series.
Results: This review included seven studies for quantitative assessment. The eligible studies had 67 patients. Included studies had used a varied number of validated upper extremity functional scoring systems; the most commonly used score was QuickDASH with mean of 21.24, DASH score was 15.5. In regard to aesthetic outcome, an overall satisfactory result was reported. A secondary debulking procedure was performed in 7 patients.
Conclusion: Further studies are recommended to ascertain the functional and aesthetic outcomes of the ALT free flap for upper limb defects, especially using standardized outcome scoring systems. This may be supplemented with a questionnaire that addresses common patient concerns (such as colour, contour, textile and hair growth) for the aesthetic outcome. Nevertheless, based on our review, the ALT flap may be a good reliable reconstructive option for upper limb defects with good functional outcome and satisfactory aesthetic results.
Keywords: Upper limb reconstruction, Anterolateral thigh, Free flap, Anterolateral thigh flap, Aesthetic outcome
References
1. Levin LS, Erdmann D. Primary and secondary microvascular reconstruction of the upper extremity. Hand Clin 2001 Aug;17(3):447-55, ix. [DOI:10.1016/S0749-0712(21)00523-0]
2. Yildirim S, Taylan G, Eker G, Akoz T. Free flap choice for soft tissue reconstruction of the severely damaged upper extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2006 Nov;22(8):599-609. [DOI:10.1055/s-2006-956234]
3. Graboyes EM, Hornig JD. Evolution of the anterolateral thigh free flap. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017 Oct;25(5):416-21. [DOI:10.1097/MOO.0000000000000394]
4. Adani R, Tarallo L, Marcoccio I, Cipriani R, Gelati C, Innocenti M. Hand reconstruction using the thin anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005 Aug;116(2):467-73; discussion 74-7. [DOI:10.1097/01.prs.0000173059.73982.50]
5. Zhang Y, Gazyakan E, Bigdeli AK, Will-Marks P, Kneser U, Hirche C. Soft tissue free flap for reconstruction of upper extremities: A meta-analysis on outcome and safety. Microsurgery 2019 Jul;39(5):463-75. [DOI:10.1002/micr.30460]
6. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998 Jun;52(6):377-84. [DOI:10.1136/jech.52.6.377]
7. Wells G SB, O'connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2016) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa 2009. Available in March.
8. Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, Bazerbachi F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid Based Med 2018 Apr;23(2):60-3. [DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110853]
9. di Summa PG, Sapino G, Durand S, et al. Reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects including tendons with anterolateral thigh flap extended to fascia lata: Long term recovery and functional outcomes. Microsurgery 2019 Jul 2019;39(5):405-15. [DOI:10.1002/micr.30431]
10. Ellabban MA, Gomaa AA, Moghazy AM, Elbadawy MA, Adly OA. Aesthetic and functional outcomes of thinned anterolateral thigh flap in reconstruction of complex wounds of the upper limb. The Journal of hand surgery, European volume 2021 Feb 2021:1753193421989603. [DOI:10.1177/1753193421989603]
11. Gideroglu K, Cakici H, Yildirim S, Yazar S, Akoz T. Functional reconstruction in large and complex soft tissue defects of forearm and hand with multifunctional anterolateral thigh flap. Eklem hastaliklari ve cerrahisi = Joint diseases & related surgery 2009;20(3):149-55.
12. Torres-Ortíz Zermeño CA, López Mendoza J. Aesthetic and functional outcomes of the innervated and thinned anterolateral thigh flap in reconstruction of upper limb defects. Plastic surgery international 2014;2014:489012. [DOI:10.1155/2014/489012]
13. Zhang G, Su H, Ju J, Li X, Hou R, Fu Y. Reconstruction of dorsal and palmar defects of hand with anterolateral thigh flaps from one donor site. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery 2019 Dec 2019;72(12):1917-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2019.08.002]
14. Cherubino M, Stocco C, Ronga M, et al. Comparisons of fascio-cutaneous anterolateral thigh and sandwich fascial ALT free flap in the distal extremity reconstruction. Microsurgery 2020 May 2020;40(4):452-9. [DOI:10.1002/micr.30515]
15. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, Upper Extremity Collaborative G. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005 May;87(5):1038-46. [DOI:10.2106/JBJS.D.02060]
16. Zhong-Wei C, Meyer VE, Kleinert HE, Beasley RW. Present indications and contraindications for replantation as reflected by long-term functional results. Orthop Clin North Am 1981 Oct;12(4):849-70. [DOI:10.1016/S0030-5898(20)30291-1]
17. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 1998 Jul;23(4):575-87. [DOI:10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80042-7]
18. stratford P.W. BJM, Stratford D. Development and initial validation of the Upper Extremity Functional Index. Physiother Can 2001; 52 (281): 259-267.
19. Lee MG, Kim JS, Lee DC, Roh SY, Lee KJ, Choi BK. Fascial Free Flap for Reconstruction of the Dorsolateral Hand and Digits: The Advantage of a Thin Contour. Archives of plastic surgery 2016 Nov 2016;43(6):551-8. [DOI:10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.551]
20. Yu YD, Zhang YZ, Bi WD, Wu T. Functional sensory function recovery of random-pattern abdominal skin flap in the repair of fingertip skin defects. Exp Ther Med 2013 Mar;5(3):830-4. [DOI:10.3892/etm.2012.877]
21. Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg 1984 Apr;37(2):149-59. [DOI:10.1016/0007-1226(84)90002-X]
22. Pappalardo M, Jeng SF, Sadigh PL, Shih HS. Versatility of the Free Anterolateral Thigh Flap in the Reconstruction of Large Defects of the Weight-Bearing Foot: A Single-Center Experience with 20 Consecutive Cases. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016 Sep;32(7):562-70. [DOI:10.1055/s-0036-1584204]
23. Park JE, Rodriguez ED, Bluebond-Langer R, et al. The anterolateral thigh flap is highly effective for reconstruction of complex lower extremity trauma. J Trauma 2007 Jan;62(1):162-5. [DOI:10.1097/01.ta.0000250599.84033.1f]
24. Kaplan JL, Allen RJ, Guerra A, Sullivan SK. Anterolateral thigh flap for breast reconstruction: review of the literature and case reports. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003 Feb;19(2):63-8. [DOI:10.1055/s-2003-37807]
25. Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Sekido M, et al. Anterolateral thigh flap for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999 Apr;103(4):1191-7. [DOI:10.1097/00006534-199904010-00014]
26. Koshima I, Fukuda H, Yamamoto H, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Ohta S. Free anterolateral thigh flaps for reconstruction of head and neck defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993 Sep;92(3):421-8; discussion 9-30. [DOI:10.1097/00006534-199309000-00005]
27. Pribaz JJ, Orgill DP, Epstein MD, Sampson CE, Hergrueter CA. Anterolateral thigh free flap. Ann Plast Surg 1995 Jun;34(6):585-92. [DOI:10.1097/00000637-199506000-00004]
28. Maruccia M, Fallico N, Cigna E, et al. Suprafascial versus traditional harvesting technique for free antero lateral thigh flap: A case-control study to assess the best functional and aesthetic result in extremity reconstruction. Microsurgery 2017 Nov;37(8):851-7. [DOI:10.1002/micr.30248]
29. Lakhiani C, DeFazio MV, Han K, Falola R, Evans K. Donor-Site Morbidity Following Free Tissue Harvest from the Thigh: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Complications. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016 Jun;32(5):342-57. [DOI:10.1055/s-0036-1583301]
30. Wang HT, Erdmann D, Fletcher JW, Levin LS. Anterolateral thigh flap technique in hand and upper extremity reconstruction. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2004 Dec;8(4):257-61. [DOI:10.1097/00130911-200412000-00009]
31. Lin PY, Chen CC, Kuo YR, Jeng SF. Simultaneous reconstruction of head and neck defects following tumor resection and trismus release with a single anterolateral thigh donor site utilizing a lateral approach to flap harvest. Microsurgery 2012 May;32(4):289-95. [DOI:10.1002/micr.21955]
32. Adler N, Dorafshar AH, Agarwal JP, Gottlieb LJ. Harvesting the lateral femoral circumflex chimera free flap: guidelines for elevation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009 Mar;123(3):918-25. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318199f51c]
33. Xie RG. Medial versus lateral approach to harvesting of anterolateral thigh flap. J Int Med Res 2018 Nov;46(11):4569-77. [DOI:10.1177/0300060518786912]
34. Kimura N, Satoh K, Hasumi T, Ostuka T. Clinical application of the free thin anterolateral thigh flap in 31 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001 Oct;108(5):1197-208; discussion 209-10. [DOI:10.1097/00006534-200110000-00015]
35. Taylor GI. The angiosomes of the body and their supply to perforator flaps. Clin Plast Surg 2003 Jul;30(3):331-42, v. [DOI:10.1016/S0094-1298(03)00034-8]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
