Volume 11, Issue 2 (2022)                   WJPS 2022, 11(2): 83-89 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kalyanimath Y J, Shivalingappa S, Mohankumar K, K Nagabhushanaiah M, P. Waiker V. Modified Technique of Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap Inset for Buccal Mucosa Reconstruction. WJPS 2022; 11 (2) :83-89
URL: http://wjps.ir/article-1-907-en.html
1- Department of Plastic Surgery, MS Ramaiah medical college, Bengaluru, India
Abstract:   (1776 Views)
Conventional technique of flap inset in buccal mucosa reconstruction is by direct suturing of cutaneous margin of Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous (PMMC) flap to hard and soft palate mucosa and margin of floor of mouth with simple interrupted sutures. We have done a prospective study of the efficacy of anchoring the upper margin of PMMC flap to the hard palate by a modified method in reconstruction of buccal mucosa defects following tumour excision. This is to prevent disruption of suture line from the mucoperiosteum of hard palate and resultant oro-cutaneous fistula.
This hospital-based prospective study was carried out in the Department of Plastic Surgery at Bangalore, India for a period of 18 months (2015–2017). Patients (N=48) with buccal mucosa defects requiring reconstruction with PMMC flap either with conventional (n=24) or modified method (n=24) following tumour excision were included. Clinico-demographic profile of the patients including age, gender, size of defect, staging of illness, site and type of reconstruction, disruption of suture margin in the hard palate, development of oro-cutaneous fistula (OCF), day of starting oral feeds, removal of Ryle’s tube and post-operative average length of stay in the hospital were recorded.
Disruption of suture line in hard palate and Oro-cutaneous fistula were statistically significant in study group in both the variables (P-0.033, P-0.033). The median days on which patients were started with oral clear liquids and removal of Ryle’s tube were also statistically significant between study and control groups. Post-operative average length of hospital stay which is the outcome of favourable results in the study group was found to be statistically significant (P-0.021) between the groups.
Overall, modified technique of anchorage of PMMC flap can be considered as a reliable technique in buccal mucosa reconstruction because of its stability, lower complication rates and shorter length of hospital stay.
Full-Text [PDF 429 kb]   (1190 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Special
ePublished: 2022/07/30

1. Joshi P, Dutta S, Chaturvedi P, Nair S. Head and neck cancers in developing countries. Rambam Maimonides Med J 2014;5(2): :e0009. [DOI:10.5041/RMMJ.10143] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Garajei A, Arabkheradmand A, Motamedi MHK, Pazoki AE, Rashad A. Reconstruction of the Face Following Cancer Ablation. A Textbook of Advanced Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Volume 2: Intech Open; 2015. [DOI:10.5772/59746] [PMID]
3. Alfouzan AF. Review of surgical resection and reconstruction in head and neck cancer: Traditional versus current concepts. Saudi Med J 2018;39(10):971-80. [DOI:10.15537/smj.2018.10.22887] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Chakrabarti S, Chakrabarti PR, Desai SM, Agrawal D, Mehta DY, Pancholi M. Reconstruction in oral malignancy: Factors affecting morbidity of various procedures. Ann Maxillofac Surgy 2015;5(2):191-7. [DOI:10.4103/2231-0746.175748] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Squaquara R, Evans KFK, di Spilimbergo SS, Mardini S, editors. Intraoral reconstruction using local and regional flaps. Seminars in plastic surgery; 2010: © Thieme Medical Publishers. [DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1255337] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Tripathi M, Parshad S, Karwasra RK, Singh V. Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction: An experience in 100 consecutive cases. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2015; 6(1):37-41. [DOI:10.4103/0975-5950.168225] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Leite A, De Matos L, Belli M, Kulcsar M, Cernea C, Brandao LG, et al. Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for head and neck reconstruction: risk factors for fistula formation. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 2014;34(6):389-93.
8. Ariyan S. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;63(1):73-81. [DOI:10.1097/00006534-197901000-00012] [PMID]
9. Kekatpure V, Trivedi N, Manjula B, Mohan AM, Shetkar G, Kuriakose M. Pectoralis major flap for head and neck reconstruction in era of free flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41(4):453-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.12.029] [PMID]
10. Thankappan K, Iyer S, Rajapurkar M, Sharma M, Subash P. Flap hitching technique to the teeth after oral cancer resection. J Surg Tech Case Rep 2012;4(1):19-21. [DOI:10.4103/2006-8808.100347] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Chaudhary R, Akhtar MS, Bariar LM, Khurram MF. Use of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for resurfacing the soft tissue defects of head and neck. Journal of Orofacial Sciences 2014;6(2):88. [DOI:10.4103/0975-8844.143046]
12. Tripathi M, Parshad SM, Kumar Karwasra R, Singh V. Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction: An Experience in 100 Consecutive Cases. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 6(1): 37-41. [DOI:10.4103/0975-5950.168225] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Venkatesh A, Punit S Dikhit, Nagraj N, Jayade B, Kumar N. PMMC flap revisited and its clinical outcome in 150 patients. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 19(1):26-31. [DOI:10.1007/s12663-019-01228-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. You YS, Chung CH, Chang YJ, Kim KH, Jung SW, Rho YS. Analysis of 120 pectoralis major flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39(5):522-27. [DOI:10.5999/aps.2012.39.5.522] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Kolokythas A. Long-term surgical complications in the oral cancer patient: a comprehensive review. Part II. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2010;1(3):e2. [DOI:10.5037/jomr.2010.1302]
16. Balakrishnan C, Narasimhan K, Gursel T, Jackson O, Schaffner A. Closure of orocutanous fistula using a pedicled expanded deltopectoral flap. Can J Plast Surg 2008;16(3):178-80. https://doi.org/10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000568 [DOI:10.1177/229255030801600305] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Prateek J, Kapila M, Dipanwita R et al. Factors affecting post-operative removal of nasogastric tube and tracheostomy tube in oral cancer: a retrospective analysis of 234 cases. Oral Cancer August 2018;2(3-4). [DOI:10.1007/s41548-018-0011-2]
18. Giullanno Molina de Melo, Karina de Cassia Braga Ribeiro et al. Risk factors for post-operative complications in Oral Cancer and their prognostic implications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:828-833.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 CC BY-NC 4.0 | World Journal of Plastic Surgery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb